Not only that but its an instance of so called “adventurism”. Such an action wouldn’t achieve much for a cause, if there is not (as shown in the movies) a larger movement behind it. The book which the film is vaguely based on and which it took the title from, makes a good argument for environment activists to move from peaceful demonstrations to destroying property (see the video I linked for a better explanation). As shown in the movie, not only is it an environmental disaster, but you gave fuel to reactionary forces
Not only that but its an instance of so called “adventurism”. Such an action wouldn’t achieve much for a cause, if there is not (as shown in the movies) a larger movement behind it. The book which the film is vaguely based on and which it took the title from, makes a good argument for environment activists to move from peaceful demonstrations to destroying property (see the video I linked for a better explanation). As shown in the movie, not only is it an environmental disaster, but you gave fuel to reactionary forces