• PunchingWood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    From what I read it was over 8 years in development, it should’ve been well beyond a rework, or maybe even a couple, already.

    I’m almost certain that Sony, as any boss, was quite done with the whole fiasco and just said “fuck it, let’s go” and just see what happens. It probably wasn’t worth the time and effort to keep putting resources into a project going nowhere.

  • Voyajer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Good bones? I thought the gameplay looked uninspired even taking into account it’s development age.

    • SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      This is exactly it. The game seemed fine, but it wasn’t doing anything to steal you away from your other games. On top of that it is $40, so there is barrier to entry. I feel bad for the developers, but the marketing team did not do enough research.

  • neidu2@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    I’m OOtL on this one. What/who is/was Concord? And what happened to it/them?

  • linkhidalgogato@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    itsnt it some generic looking shooter stuffed with micro-transactions? I really cant fathom why people even care when yet another live service “AAA” “game” gets shat out.