• Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    182
    ·
    2 months ago

    Remember folks, if you pirate scientific papers you’re stealing from the hard working…wait a minute…

  • howrar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    149
    ·
    2 months ago

    Academic Authors: $0

    FAKE NEWS

    This should be in the negatives. We have to pay to get papers published in these traditional journals.

      • xspurnx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        Don’t forget the university libraries. Yup, researchers are paid by the university, those researchers pay the publishers to place their articles, the peer reviewers are also paid by the university. And then the university has to shell out money to the publishers, so the articles can be accessed.

        • Zacryon@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          researchers are paid by the university

          Not necessarily. A lot are paid by external research grants.

          • xspurnx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I must admit what I wrote was simplified.

            If you take into account that a lot of research grants are financed by tax money though…

  • darki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    and don’t use Sci-hub people. I am warning ⚠️ you so you can avoid it 🫡

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    2 months ago

    New textbooks have disappearing ink that only lasts, about one semester, until a month before finals, and then in that month they trigger dynamic pricing increases due to a stronger than typical demand…

  • eldain@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 months ago

    I too want to open a business where both customers and suppliers pay me. Do you know any more gullible sectors? Academics are pretty extorted already it seems.

  • banana_havoc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Reviewers and writers actually do get a stipend, but it’s a token amount like 200 bucks a year. This industry is the most ass backward incentive structure we could possibly create, the only reason writers would provide articles to a journal is literally for the clout.

    • cassowary@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      2 months ago

      Really? I’ve reviewed and published a good chunk of papers and never received any financial compensation.

    • barnaclebutt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve never gotten a stipend or heard of someone getting a stipend for publishing or reviewing manuscripts. The only thing I’ve been offered is access to the journal.

      • banana_havoc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Depends on the journal I guess, my wife worked at multiple publishers and there’s normally an insultingly small stipend for the editorial board members and writers

    • blackbrook@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      They all got bought up by venture capitalists like a decade or more more ago, and this is the result.

      They were already backward, but now they are backward, ruthless about cost cutting, and care about nothing but profits.

      • very_poggers_gay [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Publishing and winning grants are the lifeblood of most academic careers

        To fund your research, you have to win grants - and to win grants, you have to have a proven history of publishing research and winning grants! Bonus points if you provide unpaid labor for granting and publishing agencies by reviewing applications and submissions.

    • Meron35@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve heard of some journals promising to pay their reviewers Amazon gift cards which they never end up sending out

  • TheChemist [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    I heard that, you are legally allowed to Email the Academic Authors, and request said articles, which they are allowed to provide for free.

    • cassowary@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      Absolutely. Plus scientists love when people want to actually read their work so you make their day too!

  • Bacano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    As much as I’m against parasitic practices, I wonder how the inevitable corruption of money would (further) skew research if academia was well paid for their papers.

    • thevoidzero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      We’re not saying pay the authors a bunch, we’re saying make the papers free to read. Or at least don’t charge authors and readers both, while keeping all the money for yourself.

    • Benaaasaaas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      And I wonder how, not having the pressure to “succeed” research (to gain further grants), would increase the quality of said research.

      • Gustephan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I quit a physics phd path just under a decade ago because my experimental results were turning up negative and the uni I was at pushed me to doctor my results so we would keep getting funded. I also wonder about this

  • wren@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve only ever published in open access journals (partially because I’ve only got 3 papers out, but also out of preference) is it just prestige that makes people go with pay-to-view journals? or are there other factors?

    • adenoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      In part it’s prestige, which for some might matter for promotion purposes, and at least personally I’m more like to cite journals for which I know I trust their judgement in peer review and submission acceptance. There are predatory publishers which abuse the open access concept to make money, and if I’m reviewing literature I don’t want to have to also research if a journal can be trusted (unless of course the publication I want to include is novel or especially worthwhile).

      Also, in many contexts open access requires payment by the authors; this may be fine if an author is in a large grant-funded lab or at an institution willing to fund the open access fee but for many of us non-research-track folks it’s kind of a deal breaker.

    • mineralfellow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Depends strongly on the community. Every sub discipline has its own standards of respectability. Publishing outside of those constraints can cause articles to be ignored.

      • wren@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        that makes a lot of sense! I’m very grateful to be part of an academic community that seems to value open access, as well of part of a university that pays for access and submission to most of the journals I need to use