• HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve been supporting Wikipedia with a monthly $5 donation. By now, ~$150 in total! I want to support all kinds of great projects, but I don’t have an infinite amount of money to share between everything that exists 😔

    I might switch to a monthly donation to The Internet Archive just because of how crucial its existence is.

    • cAUzapNEAGLb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      104
      ·
      1 month ago

      Or, it’s because whoever is doing this hates freedom of information and historical evidence. There’s a long list of powerful people and governments who have the resources and will to carry out these attacks.

      Cyber warfare is real, and the Internet archive is a museum and library of culture and truth. It provides evidence and context to our past.

      As in conventional war, it is valuable to the amoral to destroy culture and truth in order to control it. Many would like to kill that to supplant it with their version of events that can’t be refuted with evidence.

      • Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        removed is as ableist as idiot, moron or stupid. So you either need that energy for all of them or to leave it alone.

  • TypicalHog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 month ago

    They should release an app where people can donate a portion of their storage to be used for redundancy in case anything happens to the archive.

    • Fuck spez@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      While I fully support the spirit of this idea, the problem here has little to do with a lack of storage redundancy and everything to do with the bandwidth limitations of a nonprofit company vs a malicious nation state that would seek to deny access to this sort of resource. Basically, given enough bandwidth, you either become resilient to most of these attacks or you become capable of performing them yourself on anyone with a slower connection than you.

      I think the Internet Archive would be better served by direct donations, although I’d also love to see a complete torrent posted that gets updated regularly for anyone with the storage and bandwidth necessary to grab and then re-seed it. The web content alone is nearly a trillion pages, though, so that’s not going to be a long list of volunteers.

      • Citizen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        As you said, the solution is simple: Decentralized instances.

        Anyone could spin a “WebArchive” instance and have the data synced from the other independent nodes… Similar to how crypto ledgers sync transactions…

        But wait… this means anyone could see past removed important historical data from websites which may not benefit [ YOU KNOW WHO ]

  • LarkinDePark
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Probably Zionist losers having trouble with recorded history again.