• Susaga@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The spellcaster can deal a monumental amount of damage in a single spell, enough to wipe out a martial fighter in only a few turns. The martial fighter can deal multiple modest hits each round, enough to wipe out a spellcaster in only a few turns. Clearly, the winner is the trickster who pitted them against each other and hid, only coming out after a few turns had passed so they could stab the survivor.

    • Dagnet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The winner is the rogue that can do spellcaster dmg with sneak attacks that can always crit (spells with DCs can’t crit) every turn

      • Susaga@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I literally just said who the winner is. It’s the guy who stayed out of harms way until the threats took care of themselves, then came in for the victory lap. It doesn’t matter who can deal the most amount of damage. All that matters is who deals the last bit of damage.

          • Susaga@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yes, but you claimed it was a crit-fishing spellcaster with sneak attack. I already mentioned spellcasters who can do monumental amounts of damage. They’re balanced by martials who can take monumental amounts of damage.

            At no point did you explain why your guy with a high damage output is better than a guy with tactical planning skills.

            • Dagnet@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Cause rogue is a martial that doesnt do “multiple modest hits” instead does spellcasting level damage every round, spell slots, no casting components of any kind, no disadvantage when in melee, can’t be counter spelled, can disengage as a bonus, reduced dmg taken on aoe dex saves… The only thing casters do better in combat is aoe dmg, which you never mentioned. In summary, rogues do caster dmg with martial defense.

              • Susaga@ttrpg.network
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Incorrect. Scorching Ray has a higher potential damage output than a Rogue (and always will, do the math) and has a greater chance to deal at least SOME damage each turn. The rogue has higher defence than a spellcaster and higher single-target damage output than a fighter, but they also have lower defence than a fighter and lower damage output than a spellcaster. And if they miss, they get nothing.

                The disengage and dex save stuff doesn’t apply to either end of the equation. And casting components so rarely come up that it’s clear you’re just fishing.

                But again, it doesn’t matter how much damage a rogue can deal OR how tanky they are. If they defeat both the fighter and the caster but take a lot of damage in the process, they’re dead to the guy who sat out the fight until they could win. You never mentioned how a rogue is better than a guy with tactical planning skills.

                Honestly, instead of talking about a rogue’s damage capabilities, you should talk about how they can hide as a bonus action and can have expertise in Stealth. They can BE the guy with tactical planning skills, damage be damned.

                • Dagnet@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Disengage and dex save doesnt apply to how tanky rogues are? “And if they miss, they get nothing” in the same paragraph you wrote Scorching Ray? It isnt about how much dmg and tanky they are in a thread that is really only about that (a comment thread you started yourself talking about being tanky and doing dmg)? My man, this discussion is over, but only because it’s clear you have no idea what point you are trying to make.

  • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    Playing in a party with just casters is a fun time.

    Our entire party can deal room-wiping damage in a turn or two.

    Our entire party goes down in like two or three hits.

    The tankiest party member is a Magus, and even he hardly pulls tank numbers.

    All of us are constantly cowed by friendly fire being a constant threat.

    Our party’s main healer is a raging atheist and has a feat that says that if any divine healing spells are used on someone, he can’t attempt surgery on them for 24 hours, much to the chagrin of our party’s SECONDARY healer (though mostly a DPS) who is a divine caster.

    Every combat is hectic and I love it.

  • luna@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, smart casters don’t get in fights. Smart casters pile buff spells (which don’t need to beat DCs, overcome spell resistance, defend against attacks of opportunity, …) on the big stupid fighter™ so the big stupid fighter™ can get in a fight like they already want to.