• serratur@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago
    1. Coose a Linux distribution: Ubuntu, Debian, Kali Linux, OpenSUSE, etc

    :')

  • 404@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ugh, I hate this. At a time when many are searching the internet for guides, they’re injecting the search results with “It’s better if you keep Windows. But if you really, really want to, you can go through the COMPLICATED process of installing Linux BARE METAL 😱”

    • HarkMahlberg@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think that’s exaggerating. The instructions are actually fairly neutral and extremely informative, minus the obvious upsells on Microsoft software and services. It’s clear that they ordered the list of install methods by lowest complexity and highest user-friendliness, specifically for people who have only ever known Windows. It’s a good thing for Linux to give this audience a fallback option if something goes wrong with their install and they are unable to use it or fix it. If they get frustrated or brick their PC the first time they use Linux, they’ll likely go back to Windows and never return.

      They explain virtual machines, dual booting, the various pros and cons to different install methods, which methods are suitable for which purposes… I wish I had such a helpful article the first time I used Linux.

      Now, my cynical read on this article is that it’s a way for Microsoft to avoid the appearance of monopolizing the desktop market: “see regulators? we show people how they can leave our closed garden ecosystem!” But the text of the article is hardly one massive scare tactic.

      • 404@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I do agree. It just bothers me that they’re trying to pass off emulating a Linux installation (under Windows hypervision) as “installing” and refer to a true install as “bare metal”, as if your Windows installation isn’t. But it does give new users a chance to try it out.

        • mark3748@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Virtualization is not “emulating” and a bare metal install is a bare metal installation. These are standard terms. And it’s a hypervisor, no idea what the hell a hypervision is.

    • YMS@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Huh? That guide is pretty extensive in providing different options and ways, but it’s not complicated at all. The whole thing is about 2500 words, that would be about 5 pages printed. That’s probably much shorter than most Windows guides, and they are not typically offering so many options.

    • PixxlMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is clearly aimed at existing Microsoft customers wanting to use Linux for different purposes

  • Fuzzypyro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why even include the section for dual boot on metal? Windows is just going to overwrite the bootloader next forced update anyway.