• RaoulDook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    3rd party ads lead to the roulette wheel of malware injection. M$ can’t even keep the malware links off of their garbage MSN homepage on Edge. This would be an extremely dumb move, and they will do it anyway because it trades off security for money.

  • simple@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    To the surprise of absolutely nobody. There’s no way it was going to be free and have no ads.

    Edit: By the way, I don’t see many people talking about it but DALL-E 3 was stealthily launched in the new Bing chat update and it’s incredibly impressive. By far the best image generation AI in the market right now, and it probably won’t be free for long.

    • bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you think that the next step is product placement?

      “Draw a rabbit wearing a top hat.”

      Produces picture of rabbit, wearing a top hat, sipping a coke.

      • simple@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        1 year ago

        That would be hilariously evil, but I doubt they’d go that far. They’ll likely just put an ad in-between every prompt if they decide to go full greed.

        • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why not both? Why would their greed have a limit like that?

          I could see this being a very interesting watermark - the free demo is sponsored by Coke, and all images will prominently feature the product. Upgrade to a paid/business/Enterprise account to get images without the product.

          Given how many God-awful advertising patents have already been filed, I really can’t see anyone turning down this opportunity. The only reason against it would be a technological limitation- making sure the product isn’t featured alongside negative/toxic content. For instance, Hitler yelling at a bunch of homeless orphans (while holding a Coke)

    • ohlaph@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I jave had mixed results. I asked it to generate a user interface and it was absolute gibberish.

    • stopthatgirl7@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      The ads have been baked in for a while. Every time I turn on my PC, the first thing I see is it trying to get me to buy Game Pass, and when Starfield came out, it was putting pictures from the game on that startup screen. Even after I tried to turn that off, it still showed them.

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah windows has been an ad delivery platform since windows 11 came out. It’s why it was a “free” upgrade for so many people

        • Ænima@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Did you mean to say Windows 10?

          Ads have been served in Home edition since 10 was dropped with 1507. And they strip group policy from it to make it harder to change that. Windows Vista to Windows 8.1 were offered free upgrades to Windows 10, based on the version those keys belonged to.

          I’m right now testing Windows 11 deployment for work and I hate it. I’ll move to Linux before I move to Windows 11 on my personal devices.

          • kautau@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean yeah, whenever the specific changes were put in place as you outlined. I don’t use windows enough to know the history, but I appreciate the clarification

            • Ænima@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              No problem. I don’t apply my experiences to others’ lives, or at least I try not to. Thanks for taking along the lines I was trying to convey!

    • Lee Duna@lemmy.nzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right? You bought the OS but you still get ads. Even worse, it sends your data to MS servers

  • vonFalkenhawk@leuker.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Sigh, one more thing for the list …

    “Didn’t you have ads in the 21st century?”

    “Well sure, but not in our dreams. Only on TV and radio. And in magazines. And movies. And at ball games and on buses and milk cartons and t-shirts and written on the sky. Oh, and in our operating systems. But not in dreams. No siree!”

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      Microsoft: We now inject the malware attack vector directly into your OS because it makes us slightly more money.

  • itsraining@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    Like it wouldn’t.

    Please, it’s 2023. Corporarions have totally embraced the “you are the product” model. They offer you a service on their infrastructure (“the cloud”) on their terms, which they can modify and terminate on will. Then they make money by selling your data, showing you ads and using your data to personalize those ads so that you are more likely to click on them.

    Shame or ethics? Please, it’s money that makes the world go round. Ads in every app! Ads on the web! Ads in every corner of the city! Ads on public transport! More ads! Even more ads! No square centimeter of physical and virtual space left unused!

    It’s really pathetic.

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Microsoft will keep doing this shit until their monopoly is broken.

    I don’t know why people are continuously surprised at MS doing scummy things when they pretty much control the market, have little to no competition, and regulators have proven they don’t care.

  • Anonymousllama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Truly amazing. Usually you roll out these features, get the userbase involved and intrigued at these new features, get used to them and THEN try and monetize it to capitalize on the sunk cost feeling

  • Fish [Indiana]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I was finally able to get rid of the ads in Windows. I’m sure that it doesn’t block everything, but editing the ‘hosts’ file helps. At least I don’t see any ads in Windows anymore. Here is an simple tutorial that I found on how to do so:

    youtu.be/IJr2DcffquI

  • clanginator@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I removed copilot the instant I saw it. I don’t need any more Microsoft online shit built into my OS, thanks. (I also use Arch, but Windows kernel anti-cheat)

  • plz1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Here’s the knife they slip in with a new “free” feature in Windows…

    At least with co-pilot for O365, they are charging (a lot of) money for the feature, presumably without ads.