cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/6400367
cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/6400327
In case anyone is wondering, it’s rqd2.
The definition of paraphilia is “a condition characterized by abnormal sexual desires, typically involving extreme or dangerous activities.”, which can inclde pedophilia.
It has recieved 4 censures from fediseer due to the content contained on that instance
Not a good look for Lemmy to be promoting any instance like that.
Update: A pull request was sent to remove the sus instance. It should no longer show up soon
I don’t have a link, and not saying I agree with their answer, but the lemmy creators (and maintainers of join-lemmy answered this in a AMA about a month ago. They said they’d prefer the horrible people concentrate in their own instances so we can block them easily rather than have them in our instances. The join lemmy list does not serve as an endorsement, but a catalog of all available instances.
You’re really reaching here.
A sketchy instance shows up near the bottom of an un-curated list of the largest instances.
Who exactly should we be mad at?
Also
“The definition of paraphilia is “a condition characterized by abnormal sexual desires, typically involving extreme or dangerous activities.”, which can inclde pedophilia.”
“… can inclde [sic]”.
Even a foot fetish can be described as paraphilia.
Even a foot fetish can be described as paraphilia.
That’s true! But it’s also hosting MAP (Minor Attracted Persons), zoophile, and Beastiality communities. It’s listed as a pedo instance on fediseer, and on fediblock lists, like the pleroma.envs.net blocklist.
@dramaticcat Thanks for the advise. I will add it to my block list.
WTF are you talking about fetishes for?
