On this day in 1983, a patent was granted to MIT for a new cryptographic algorithm: RSA. “RSA” stands for the names of its creators Rivest, Shamir, and Adlemen. RSA is a “public-key” cryptosystem. Prior to the creation of RSA, public-key cryptography was not in wide use.
Public-key cryptography
Cryptography is the study and practice of secure communication. Throughout most of its historical use, cryptographic techniques were entirely dependent on the involved parties already sharing a secret that could be used to reverse an encryption process. In early cryptography, the secret was itself the encryption process (for example, a Caesar cipher that substitutes letters in a secret message with letters a fixed number of steps down the alphabet). As cryptography became more systematic and widespread in use, it became necessary to separate cryptographic secrets from the cryptographic techniques themselves because the techniques could become known by the enemy (as well as static cryptographic schemes being more vulnerable to cryptanalysis). Regardless, there is still the issue of needing to share secrets between the communicating parties securely. This has taken many forms over the years, from word of mouth to systems of secure distribution of codebooks. But this kind of cryptography always requires an initial secure channel of communication to exchange secrets before an insecure channel can be made secure by the use of cryptography. And there is the risk of an enemy capturing keys and making the entire system worthless.
Only relatively recently has this fundamental problem been addressed in the form of public-key cryptography. In the late 20th century, it was proposed that a form of cryptography could exist where the 2 parties, seeking to communicate securely, could exchange some non-secret information (a “public” key) derived from privately held secret information (a “private” key), and use a mathematical function (a “trap-door” function) that is easy to compute in one direction (encryption) but hard to reverse without special information (decryption) to encipher messages to each other, using each other’s respective public keys, that can’t be easily decrypted without the corresponding private key. In other words, it should be easy to encipher messages to each other using a public key but hard to decrypt messages without the related private key. At the time this idea was proposed there was no known computationally-hard trap-door function that could make this possible in practice. Shortly after, several candidates and cryptosystems based upon them were described publicly 👁, including one that is still with us today…
RSA
Ron Rivest, Adi Shamir, and Leonard Adleman at MIT had made many attempts to find a suitably secure trap-door function for creating a public-key cryptosystem over a year leading up to the publication of their famous paper in 1978. Rivest and Shamir, the computer scientists of the group, would create a candidate trap-door function while Adleman, the mathematician, would try to find a way to easily reverse the function without any other information (like a public key). Supposedly, it took them 42 attempts before they created a promising new trap-door function.
As described in their 1978 paper “A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems”, RSA is based upon the principle that factoring very large numbers is computationally difficult (for now!). The paper is a great read, if you’re interested in these topics. The impact of RSA can’t be overstated. The security of communications on the internet have been dependent on RSA and other public-key cryptosystems since the very beginning. If you check your browser’s connection info right now, you’ll see that the cryptographic signature attached to Hexbear’s certificate is based on RSA! In the past, even the exchange of symmetric cipher keys between your web browser and the web server would have been conducted with RSA but there has been a move away from that to ensure the compromise of either side’s RSA private keys would not compromise all communications that ever happened.
The future of RSA?
In 1994, a mathematician named Peter Shor, developed an algorithm for quantum computers that would be capable of factoring the large integers used in the RSA scheme. In spite of this, RSA has seen widespead and increasing use in securing communications on the internet. Until recently, the creation of a large enough quantum computer to run Shor’s algorithm at sufficient scale was seen as very far off. With advances in practical quantum computers though, RSA is on its way out. Although current quantum computers are still a very long way off from being able to break RSA, it’s looking more and more plausable that someone could eventually build one that is capable of cracking RSA. A competition being held by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, similar to the one that selected the Advanced Encryption Algorithm, is already underway to select standard cryptographic algorithms that can survive attacks from quantum computers.
Megathreads and spaces to hang out:
- ❤️ Come listen to music and Watch movies with your fellow Hexbears nerd, in Cy.tube
- 💖 Come talk in the New Weekly Queer thread
- 💛 Read and talk about a current topics in the News Megathread
- ⭐️ September Movie Nominations ⭐️
reminders:
- 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
- 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
- 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
- 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
- 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog
Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):
Aid:
Theory:
New Megathread Nerds!!!
It’s my first megathread, I hope you like it! I am somewhat nervous about posting it lol
-
🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog
-
🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can go here nerd
@aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net @Abraxiel@hexbear.net @Abstraction@hexbear.net @Acute_Engles@hexbear.net @AnarchaPrincess@hexbear.net @AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net @Alaskaball@hexbear.net @AlicePraxis@hexbear.net @Aliveelectricwire@hexbear.net @artificialset@hexbear.net @asa_red_heathen@hexbear.net @autismdragon@hexbear.net @Awoo@hexbear.net @bbnh69420@hexbear.net @BirdBrained@hexbear.net @buh@hexbear.net @CDommunist@hexbear.net @Cherufe@hexbear.net @ClimateChangeAnxiety@hexbear.net @clover@hexbear.net @Comp4@hexbear.net @ComradeCmdrPiggy@hexbear.net @ComradeEchidna@hexbear.net @context@hexbear.net @corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net @CrispyFern@hexbear.net @CriticalOtaku@hexbear.net @Cromalin@hexbear.net @CyborgMarx@hexbear.net @Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net @Dolores@hexbear.net @drinkinglakewater@hexbear.net @Dryad@hexbear.net @ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net @ElGosso@hexbear.net @el_principito@hexbear.net @EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net @FALGSConaut@hexbear.net @Flinch@hexbear.net @forcequit@hexbear.net @Frank@hexbear.net @Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net @FuckyWucky@hexbear.net @GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net @Goadstool@hexbear.net @GorbinOutOverHere@hexbear.net @Grownbravy@hexbear.net @GVAGUY3@hexbear.net @HarryLime@hexbear.net @hexaflexagonbear@hexbear.net @Ho_Chi_Chungus@hexbear.net @Hooray4dolphins@hexbear.net @InevitableSwing@hexbear.net @iridaniotter@hexbear.net @jabrd@hexbear.net @JamesConeZone@hexbear.net @Kaputnik@hexbear.net @kristina@hexbear.net @LesbianLiberty@hexbear.net @Magician@hexbear.net @MaxOS@hexbear.net @Melina@hexbear.net @Mindfury@hexbear.net @mkultrawide@hexbear.net @Nagarjuna@hexbear.net @Nakoichi@hexbear.net @PaulSmackage@hexbear.net @plinky@hexbear.net @Pluto@hexbear.net @PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net @President_Obama@hexbear.net @Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net @Redcuban1959@hexbear.net @RION@hexbear.net @RNAi@hexbear.net @Rojo27@hexbear.net @SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net @solaranus@hexbear.net @SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net @Sickos@hexbear.net @silent_water@hexbear.net @Sphere@hexbear.net @spring_rabbit@hexbear.net @SunsetFruitbat@hexbear.net @take_five_seconds@hexbear.net @Teekeeus@hexbear.net @Tervell@hexbear.net @UlyssesT@hexbear.net @VHS@hexbear.net @viva_la_juche@hexbear.net @WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net @Wheaties@hexbear.net @WhyEssEff@hexbear.net @WIIHAPPYFEW@hexbear.net @wtypstanaccount04@hexbear.net @wombat@hexbear.net @Zoift@hexbear.net @Zuzak@hexbear.net
@thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net @WhoaSlowDownMaurice@hexbear.net @Quimby@hexbear.net
@CARCOSA@hexbear.net @liberal@hexbear.net @ella@hexbear.net @all_or_nothing@hexbear.net @KenBonesWildRide@hexbear.net @KiraNerys@hexbear.net @TomboyShulk@hexbear.net @DuckNuckem@hexbear.net @SapGreen@hexbear.net @Zangief@hexbear.net @scumlord@hexbear.net @COMMENT@hexbear.net @Antisocial_Socialist@hexbear.net @DOPESMOKERDENG@hexbear.net @BoarAvoir@hexbear.net
Remember nerds just like in the old site, no current struggle session discussion here on the new general megathread, i will ban you from the comm and remove your comment, have a good day/night :meow-coffee:
Early mega hits different
Good thread friend!
New mega, hell yeah
ok i pull up
Happy first mega!
Howdy
Great topic, I’m a dev and knew some of this but still learned some stuff. Thanks!
-
deleted by creator
True crime fans say the dumbest shit when they get invested in a case and start assigning morality to literally just observational positions.
“Oh how can you say this might create doubt for a jury when you havent seen all of the evidence? How can you possibly say that?”
Literally how are you into true crime if you suddenly start having issues with speculation based on incomplete information?
True crime “fans” and content creators are typically very disrespectful to the cases and victims. Like why are you doing asmr or doing your makeup or making jokes while talking about a little girl being murdered?
And the racism and ableism is so disgusting. If the victim is a poc and the perpetrator is white, they’re so much more likely to write it off as a suicide or freak accident. Any “weird” body language is a clear sign someone is a “sociopath” or “psychopath” when they’re just picking apart someone’s every move
Don’t get me started on the bootlicking for forensics
True crime communities become unhinged so quick. They get emotionally invested, posting about how sad they are, or vengeance posting about how the perpetrator should be SA’ed in prison. They start developing parasocial relationships with the people involved, posting memorial collages, etc. They overanalyze every new detail and draw connections between everything.
I used to enjoy following the Jeremy Dewitte case, the serial police impersonator who videotaped himself pretending to be a cop for years. It was fun, but the communities following the case went so hard into analyzing every little detail that they became convinced that everything was a conspiracy. A bunch of “influencers” started making channels pretending to have inside information, claiming to have sources inside the police or personally knowing cops involved in the case.
My wife used to be friends in high school with this couple that ended up being super reactionary. The dude ended up getting testosterone because he couldn’t get abs. He’s ostensibly opposed to gender affirming care unless he’s trying to be hotter. I thought this shit was hard to get? Just not for lunatics?
It might be hard to get from a doctor, but go to any more “serious” gym and you can probably find a T hookup
Abs are genetic and you have to have like 0% body fat to see them anyway.
depends on if he’s getting it legitimately or not ig, but T definitely has secondary markets
He’s ostensibly opposed to gender affirming care unless he’s trying to be hotter.
A genuinely good bit nice one
Since I know everyone here is very invested in my love life, got my first phone number from having the corgi with me on Sunday. Got a date on friday! They’re a special ed teacher (is there a better word for that? please tell me if so) that plays a lot of DnD. Pretty stoked! Promising job interview lined up for next week, and doing mutual aid work (food rescue and distro) over the weekend.
Special ed. teacher is always what my dad called his job, he is pretty old though. People that exclusively work as classroom assistants sometimes go by parapro.
Thanks!
My dog got that newly unleashed rizz something fierce.
buy tasty potato chip
goes fucking great with sour cream
see sour cream on sale
“nah I’m pretty sure we got sour cream at home”
there was not sour cream at home
God damn, I’m certain this kind of shit is the worst thing that can happen to a person in the entire world. Universe, even.
This kinda stuff is making me consider making an inventory of all the food and ingredients I have so I stop doing this ;_;
deleted by creator
Twitter right now is so full of reddit-ass engagement bait questions like “what song is secretly sad?” but instead of the answers being the results of a thousand people googling “famous secretly sad song” it’s 999 dogshit unrelated memes and one guy going “hey ya!”
D O G S H I T C E P T I O N
edit: thanks for the gold kind stranger
Which hot take has you in the gallows
There’s some sort of weird cold going around that’s really laid out most of my coworkers, should I be worried?
There’s supposed to be anti-lgbtq rallies here today. Too bad for them, I’m a pediatrics nurse and I’m wearing my pride stuff to work today just to spite yall. Sucks to suck 🖕
FWIIII
Huh! Hooh! Huh! Hooh! Huh! Hooh! Huh! Hooh!baiting felix biederman onto this site with a metaphorical box-and-stick trap
FWIIII
Huh! Hooh! Huh! Hooh! Huh! Hooh!
FWIIII
Huh! Hooh! Huh! Hooh! Huh! Hooh!
we don’t have enough Dark Souls emojis
deleted by creator
what’s your secret
deleted by creator
My partner just eats an incomprehensible amount of lettuce to get the fiber
Yeah anyone who enjoys “abuser lit” like The Hungry Hungry Caterpillar is pretty sus in my eyes. My nephew is getting into it. I’m worried, it’s a straight pipeline from there to spending hours watching Koch-funded tiktok accounts.
these taglines man
I wish the tag lines had links to a dunk tank post for them so I could see where they come from. This one is unhinged and I need to know what the fuck is going on.
today is not a day comrades
fun fact, all is not lost when a quantum computer becomes capable of breaking factorization-based crypto algorithm. there is in fact a subfield of mathematics that is dedicated primarily to this exact question called post-quantum cryptography. it generally involves using other kinds of mathematical structures than just the integers to construct algorithms that are not vulnerable to Shor’s algorithm or some other known exploit. i had a professor during my undergrad that worked in it and claimed to have been harassed regularly when doing international travel because i guess what’s in his head qualifies as a national security interest. crazy shit.
Yeah! It’s gonna be interesting to see which algorithm wins NIST’s post-quantum cryptography competition. The math involved in the current round 4 candidates is beyond me at this time lol
i had a professor during my undergrad that worked in it and claimed to have been harassed regularly when doing international travel because i guess what’s in his head qualifies as a national security interest. crazy shit.
Wtf, that’s wild
NIST’s post-quantum cryptography competition
holy fuck, he’s on this a couple times for attacks on the submissions, that’s crazy but also not surprising.
Woah that’s awesome lol
The thing about it being super advanced math is it makes it easier to hide shit in it. Like those elliptic curves that NIST put out that people think have an NSA backdoor in them https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_EC_DRBG