• rentar42@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I vaguely remember a perk in some expansion book of some Shadowrun edition that was basically “common sense” and ruleswise it meant that once per game session the GM should ask you “are you sure about that” when you’re about to do something stupid. That’s it. If you go ahead, you go ahead. If you don’t realize that they are triggering the perk, you go ahead. If you never do anything stupid (yeah, right), they will never ask.

      I tend to give that to my players “for free”, but I still love that it’s been encoded as a perk that’s worth some points at character generation.

      • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It does make sense. Players aren’t their PCs, they don’t see the world as their PC does, so things that would be obvious from their PC’s perspective aren’t necessarily from the player’s. That disconnect means there are bound to be times when players do stupid stuff their PC wouldn’t actually do, so a nudge from the GM can set them straight

        • rentar42@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, but there’s a fine line to draw here as a GM: as a theoretical extreme, if I intervened every time I thought their PC would “definitely know this” or “would never do this”, then I start to play the PC more than they do.

          Or put differently: that disconnect between player knowledge/actions and PC knowledge/actions is unavoidable to some degree. How much of it is tolerated/expected pretty much depends on your goals/playstile/desires on the group. Some players really care about “playing the PC right” and others really just see them as a puppet to control (in which case they can’t “play them wrong”).

          • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh absolutely. There’s always going to be disconnects between what the player knows/remembers, and what their PC should, but I mean intervening more when a player exceedingly defying their PC’s common sense.

            Like in this example, both the player and PC know what this scepter does, both are aware they’re standing rather near it. As a wizard, the PC is likely more than wise and intelligent enough to come to the conclusion that casting destruction magic here would be bad.

            But because the player isn’t physically there, and isn’t familiar with magic in the way a wizard would be, there is a disconnect in common sense.

            Of course it varies by game and GM, but in this scenario I wouldn’t believe it a bad thing for the GM to give a little nudge to the player that what they’re suggesting to do is life-threateningly stupid, given their PC would’ve likely done the same if they could hear their player speak.

  • Ellie_The_Nurse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So Fireball makes a 20ft radius sphere. That’s a sphere with a volume of 33,510.322 ft^3 A sphere 100 times bigger would be 3,351,032.2 ft^3 Such a sphere would have a radius of 92.832ft The range of fireball is 150ft, so you could safely cast it’s 100x magnitude counterpart. Of course this is a very simplified idea of what 100x magnitude fireball could do. For instance, does it do 100x the fire damage? ~2,800? That’s over 50.9x more than lava (which is ~55). Does that mean it’s 50.9x hotter than lava? Making it 35,630-61,080 C, 6-11x hotter than the surface of the sun? These calculations are all fast and loose as actual explosion calculations are too complicated for my little brain.

    • eldain@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      When the DM starts rolling 800d6, you need to cast jump and jump 3000ft away.

    • ImpossibilityBox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      The slight DM pedant in me is torn about how you chose to interpret the size of the sphere.

      There is absolutely no reason to not use volume as the thing being modified by the item EXCEPT as far as I am aware the RAW is that the fireball is measured by its radius.

      By that reasoning the new fireball should have a radius of 200 ft. Which is obscenely large and also puts the caster within the blast radius.

      If I remember correctly in older editions the fireball would also fill up rooms until it’s full VOLUME was achieved not necessarily just it’s radius.

      Meaning a 20ft radius fireball would fill a 5ft x 5ft hallway/tunnel (weird size I know… easy math) for 1,340ft and the new 200ft radius (33,510,300 ft^3) fireball would fill the same hallway for… 1,340,412 FEET OR JUST SHORT OF 254 MILES OF TUNNEL!

      If my players were stupid enough cat fireball on a magic enhancing object, personally, I’m using the later object and also multiplying the damage by 100.

      Their new party can start by investigating the massive village size crater recently discovered by the locals.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I haven’t played dnd since 3.0 so I didn’t remember they’re that big… I mean, that’s “don’t cast it anywhere but in the desert” territory 🤣

          • Redscare867@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            In 5e evocation wizards get an ability that allows them to choose up to 1 + the spells level friendly targets that are unaffected by an evocation spell. This makes several of these large area of effect spells safe to use.

    • Acer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Such a sphere would have a radius of 92.832ft The range of fireball is 150ft, so you could safely cast it’s 100x magnitude counterpart.

      Maybe I’m stupid but I don’t see how you could safely cast it. Even if you cast it all the way back at the edge of the range you still would be inside the radius.

      • ImpossibilityBox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The radius is the size of the sphere as measured from the center of the explosion.

        Maybe this analogy helps.

        You throw a ball at a wall and it bounces back towards you. If the ball reaches you or passes you then you die.

        You can throw a ball (the fireball) 150ft. At the end of your throw it hits a wall (center of explosion). The ball bounces back towards you 92.832ft (explosion radius/edge of explosion). The ball is now 57.168 ft away from you. Ball did not reach you therefore you live.

      • Ellie_The_Nurse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If you cast it so that it’s point of origin is 150ft away from you, then it would expand both 93ft towards you and 93ft away from you. By expanding 93ft towards you, there’d still be a gap of 57ft between you and the edge of the fireball. The farthest point edge of the fireball would be 243ft away.

  • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    A very similar situation happened in an old campaign of mine where the player had some fair warning about consequences but went and did a thing that blew up a fucking moon of the setting.

    The environmental consequences alone defined the next few generations of the setting. I just rolled with it and after a while I went from sicko-no to sicko-beaming

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Somewhere there exists a list of all TTRPG war crimes ever committed. Honestly, depending on location, this one could be anywhere pretty high on that list, but probably not in the top 100.

  • Acer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Okay but a Sorcerer with Careful Spell could make it work

    • blue_zephyr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Careful spell doesn’t prevent damage, just ensures you take half: 800d6 / 2 in this case. You’re thinking of the sculpt spells feature from the evocation wizard school.