• b1tstrem1st0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really wish there were apps like LibreTube for all the other popular socials to circumvent “For You”.

    • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Amazon has started this bullshit “for you” crap with lists. You know wish lists, the things you create to keep track of stuff you’d like to purchase, or share with others as gift ideas? If you’re going there it’s because you are ready to make a purchase of something that you want or need. But making a purchase isn’t enough anymore? They’re like “look at all this other shit we’d rather have you buy, instead of the stuff you want to buy”. What in the actual fuck? Go away! Get fucked. Die!

    • JustinHanagan@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I personally am a big advocate of “no entertainment on mobile devices” whatsoever, but that said- I’ve played around with this modified version of Instagram and it’s pretty cool. I don’t think it changes the sort to chronological, but it does remove suggested content and allows users to turn off stories, reels and more (use at your own risk, I have no idea the safety of this).

      • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is this open source or vetted in any way? I love the idea, but I don’t want to just install some apk from a random site.

  • steltek@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The choice between “Algorithm” and “Chronological” is a false dichotomy. Lemmy has several choices and the default for me is “active”, not chronological. And why can’t I have multiple separate streams of subscriptions by a grouping of my choice?

    • JustinHanagan@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The essay is not about suggesting a dichotomy. The article is about how corporations sort their content feeds based on maximizing profitability, and the subsequent consequences that result for the end user (humans) in the form of endless distractions.

      • Deftdrummer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What’s the story for Lemmy then? With no corporate interests behind the scenes, what metrics is Lemmy using to sort?

        • JustinHanagan@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Lemmy devs actually publish their goals/methods for “hot” and “active” sorting here. You may find it of value!

          The important difference, imo, is that Fediverse users have final say over the sorting of their own feeds. Reddit/Twitter/etc prioritize engagement, not actual value added to the user.

  • neptune@dmv.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Limbic capitalism. Good stuff.

    Yeah, free market people really either love the idea of legalizing heroin OR pretending their is a clean and obvious line between what should be illegal in a free market and what’s just kind of bad and reasonable people can control their urges over.

  • djquadratic@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Interesting article, I really liked it! I appreciated the link you made to keeping junk food in the house to encourage people to delete those apps off the phone. I wonder if the junkie statements at the beginning might be a turnoff to readers who might be on the fence (if that’s an audience you’re trying to appeal to)