• eric5949@lemmy.cloudaf.site
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well yeah, the internet made anyone who wants to be a journalist capable of being a “journalist” so of course quality goes down. Both the Internet killed journalism and journalists are crap at writing are true, the latter because of the former.

            • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Those two things aren’t even remotely the same. Comparing them makes zero sense. One is a light weight investigator delivering updates on happenings in the world, the other is a creator of fictional stories for entertainment.

                • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You claimed journalists became journalists because they couldn’t hack it. Which is obvious nonsense given the fact that there are university courses for journalism. Meaning people intend to become journalists.

                  I get it. It’s hot to be anti-“the media” right now, but your claims are just reading like a zealot ranting.

  • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    From TFA:

    This was during the glorious dawn of the Web 2.0 revolution—an era of unbridled Obama-era optimism

    So the web two-oh started in 2009 now? I’m pretty sure I first started getting the telltale nausea circa 2000.