You wouldn’t have electricity without metal things, so metalsmithing has a bigger impact. But you can’t manipulate metal without fire…
Basically sticks are the most impactful.
You wouldn’t have electricity without metal things, so metalsmithing has a bigger impact. But you can’t manipulate metal without fire…
Basically sticks are the most impactful.
The Internet is like TV 2.0?
You’re comparing a unidirectional medium to a bidirectional medium, just for starters. It’d be much more appropriate to compare the Internet to phone or telegraph, but neither of those are adequate either.
Consider that the internet enabled smartphones. Many other things did too, but the thing that separates smartphones from those other things is Internet. It turned an already cool wireless global voice communication device into the equivalent of like 40 separate devices you used to own 30 years ago, but that fits in your pocket, and can still do unbelievable god-like shit that just wasn’t possible back then, period.
Smartphones are so ridiculous that in many movies made today they have to pretend smartphones don’t exist, because if they did then the problems that form the basis of the plot wouldn’t—so I see a lot of movies that look like they’re set in circa 2000s, i.e. mostly present day with dumbphones. Anyway.
All this is not to say that anything is more impactful than electricity. I’m just saying Internet is not tv 2.0.
Watch your fucking mouth, those are Job Providers you’re talking shit about
If society has a problem with Bill Burr, then I don’t want to live in that society.
Quite notable, that Bernard.
Your mistake is in thinking that representation in the media/web sphere = representation in the population. White I don’t know the numbers, I reckon that the percentage of the population that doesn’t want a headphone is less than half—possibly much less.
It doesn’t matter how common the written error is, because the ambiguity is omnipresent in speech and we sort it out every day of our lives, so it will always be easy as fuck.
FYI, both of you are overacting. It’s weird to react to the correction so seriously, but equally weird for you to get so offended by the error. Both of you be better.
You’re currently in violation of the oldest, most sacred rule of secret-sharing, and recommend you amend that per your obligation to the social contract, as a matter of principle.
“Wait! How did you beat me when I hit every note perfectly? I’ve never seen anyone use their whammy bar the entire time—just what in the hell was that?”
“Nao, that’s what I call music.”
What’s the basis for that argument, especially in refutation of his detractors?
I get the school arcs because they’re a lot more relatable for the Japanese audience that is actually going through that experience.
Homelessness.
Billionaires.
War.
Magic, aka science and technology.
Is this /s or no? Honestly can’t tell; neither would surprise me.
Both perspectives are defensible. The question could be interpreted generally on its own, or in the context of OP’s new-user experience. Personally I would lean towards the latter, but that makes an assumption that the] look