• 0 Posts
  • 26 Comments
Joined 5 个月前
cake
Cake day: 2025年7月2日

help-circle


  • Very bad faith from you. Kribsoo Diallo is a Cairo-based Pan-Africanist researcher in political science related to African affairs.

    Yeah I know that’s how he’s described by those that use him for their articles. But from his own description on his Soundcloud it looks like he’s not as much of a researcher in political science but more of a self-declared guru in whatever he wants:

    my name is mahmoud I am a positive individual whose aspiration is to become successful in life spiritually, financially, socially, physically and mentally I also plan on becoming a sucessful individual so that I could be a prominent and positive example for others to follow so that they could eventually lead and prosper in whatever occupation or field of their choosing I currently reside in Cairo but my roots in Nubia cause im a Nubian and I am a lifelong learner a knowledge seeker, a motivational speaker and righteous teacher on the subjects of motivation, success, African history, comparative politics, philosophy, economics and the totality of life I am currently a college student and a motivational speaker who motivates and inspires others to gain a self identity and to gain an education because it is the key to liberation success and elevation studied the human race’s origins and pre-colonial African culture and my ideological Pan-Africanism

    what you wrote are not grounds to dismiss the investigation done regarding Sudan […] then you should also take with a grain of salt whatever Western media outlet that you have in your mind as a “better” source

    No I don’t. Two shit sources do not a not shit source make. If you believe Mr. Positive Energy’s claim that seeing the RSF use western made weapons means that they are directly supplied by that list of countries today, I repeat my question whether you also believe that them using AK’s and PKM’s means Putin is secretly organising the genocide?






  • Sure, but that’s not the point I was making. I simply chose to point out the OP’s most obvious lie.

    With regard to the accusation of Iran forcing it on people, you’re both right that the article that the OP chose to comment on only refers to a short conclusionary UN report, which does not include references to its claims.

    But it would probably have taken the OP less time to do their research into this and find some sources than it took them to make their post and put in some quotes and a funny picture. To then imply that it must be a lie because the information was not presented to them on a silver platter.

    It really just takes 1-2 minutes to find articles on this like this one. I first read about this issue after Israel bombed the prison where Iran was keeping lgbtqai+ and trans prisoners.

    Even if you don’t think it’s necessary to put in 2 minutes of research before posting stuff like this on the internet, I would advise everyone to be very careful to question the UN or (somewhat reputable) journalists regarding Iran doing some crazy shit

    It’s public that Iranian law prescribes the death penalty for male-on-male sex. Or adultery or repeated sex outside marriage for that matter. If your government is going to kill you for loving the person you love, do you really think some of those people wouldn’t agree to gender surgery if that meant they’d stay alive?





  • If you really want to pretend that religion doesn’t play a part in this conflict, I don’t really see how that would help anyone… It just makes certain behaviour unexplainable for you and, hence, as long as you are in denial of this you won’t be in a position to think of a realistic path forward. Why would Trump have to buy off Malaysia to support his ultimatum and not, say, Brazil?

    Regarding Ukraine, I don’t think that religion is a(n important) driver there. That conflict was caused by an internal political rift where one parted wanted to align with the EU and the other with Russia. Which explains why the division isn’t along religious but political (and partly ethnic) lines.

    And in the tradition of always finding your last sentences the most revealing: what religion do you believe those zero-year-olds were following?


  • means […] It means […] it means […]

    There are zero steps of assumption or inference required here

    .

    What point were you trying to make that I missed? Is part of the Sunni religion that you must support Donald Trump?

    You seem to want to derail the converstation to make it appear like I argue that it has something to do with the nature of their religion, but they could be worshipping the Holy Teapot as far as I’m concerned. If you want to go into why I think it’s mentionable that basically all of the important sunni states are on board I suggest you start by reading about the Abraham Accords and how that history ties in with what happened with Gaza.

    Do you have a recording of this apology? Since it was public, there must be a recording.

    His apology is public in the sense that they proudly and loudly proclaimed he did so before praising Qatar for supporting their plan. Whether he called him buddy or Susan isn’t really the relevant part here

    You’re still being orientalist. It’s very off-putting. Would you accept a fraction of this attitude towards your own home?

    I think it’s interesting that you’re turning from “religion has nothing to do with this” to something like this.

    If someone were to say that ‘my home’ (as in the building I live in?) has a history of religious conflict I’d honestly just be stunned and ask them to give me some examples, because I don’t think there are.

    If you mean ‘my home region’ then I’d say they’re entirely right: religious conflicts made people do horrible, horrible things to eachother around here, and it’s important to remember that.

    But the words you’re using makes it sound more like you don’t honestly believe that there isn’t a religious angle to the conflict with Israel but instead that you think there should be some kind of taboo on it? Because any mention of it would hurt the feelings of those who live in the region?


  • Please explain to me how my abbreviation does anything else than

    Feel free to let me know where you’re reading that Palestinians should kill themselves. Trumps weaseling is not an excuse to follow his example.

    They are not Sunni states. They are states. And both are client states of the USA.

    There are eight sunni states that put themselves behind Donnie, including the most important ones. You can try to brush this off because they were already very friendly to him, but yeah, that’s the point.

    The Qatari prime minister said

    Sure, and making Bibi publicly apologize to him and Donnie assure they would not allow it to happen again was offered to allow him to save face. Why else do you think they did that?

    Article 13 enables the death of all Palestinians at the moment of Israel’s choosing

    I don’t know which list they’ve sent you but in mine article 13 is about the disarmament of Hamas

    This is not a religious conflict. You’re being orientalist.

    Yeah, thanks for opening my eyes! I’ve just reread the history of the region and indeed, religious differences were never an issue there


  • It’s funny that you complain about weasel wording but can’t see it in yourself or, more likely, allow it for yourself. Your claims that the Palestinians have to kill themselves or leave under this ‘plan’ doesn’t jive with reality.

    Donnie knows that staying friends with the sunni states makes him a lot of money. A lot more money than he can ever make from the people that would give that up to add a small strip of land to Israel. Making the supposedly “fully behind Palestine” leaders of these countries lose face completely by having them backing this plan publicly and then shredding it will lose him a lot of money.

    It’s much more profitable to continue their alliance. Removing the threat of Hamas in the same way as was done with Hezbollah makes everyone* happy and opens the opportunity to make money from it either way. They can say they saved the Gazans while Israel gets a security upgrade and hostages.

    (* except the ultrazionists, which may have swing because they can drop the Israeli government but are still a rather small faction despite what people try to make you believe. If Hamas agree publicly, Bibi will go for elections before he’ll slap Trump with a 180 to please these bozo’s.)

    .

    Why do you describe them as ‘muslim majority’, are you implying this a holy war?

    Ah yes, the good ol’ “Sir, how dare you imply a religious conflict?!” smh