• 0 Posts
  • 7 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 22nd, 2024

help-circle
  • Why not both, with Brave? I know their are kinda hated for making changes without warning the user, but it seems to be the closest thing to a fairly private and secure browser… Plus they have a whole team behind it, not just some guy in his basement (nothing against guys in their basements btw, it’s just harder to be on top of security issues when you’re one).





  • More or less. Adnauseam could potentially be better for bloggers than UBo, but it really depends on how Google, Facebook, Bing interpret those “fake” clicks. If Facebook/Google can identify these clicks, they could make the choice of charging the advertiser regardless (and pay the blogger), OR exclude that impression (meaning the blogger doesn’t get paid), OR, if they identify a particular blog attracts more adnauseam users than usual (perhaps a privacy/security-related blog), they could exclude the blog from their ad programs entirely. Please understand this is all highly speculative because we don’t really know how these platforms treat fake clicks, if they are even aware of them at all, and so on.

    I expanded further on how online advertising works on another thread in this post, if you’d be like to read it.



  • PirateMike94@lemmy.worldtoPrivacy@lemmy.mlwho pays for clicked ads?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    You mostly hurt the owner of the website displaying the ad, if their platform depends on it.

    Both the ad distributor (Google, Facebook,etc) and the business advertising are generally not affected because ads not shown aren’t paid for. Advertisers pay per 1000 impressions (views, clicks, etc), so if an ad doesn’t even load, it does not count as an impression and therefore the ad distributor doesn’t charge for that impression.