- 0 Posts
- 32 Comments
BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zipto
Science@mander.xyz•Tattoo Ink Moves Through the Body, Killing Immune Cells and Weakening Vaccine Response
24·1 month agoPlease spare us your pointless complaints.
BananaIsABerry@lemmy.ziptoShare Funny Videos, Images, Memes, Quotes and more @lemmy.ml•Translating western propaganda
2·1 month agoDutch move to of Chinese firm
BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zipto
Casual UK@feddit.uk•Anyone ever see this used on a salad?English
2·2 months agoSame ingredients as most “salad” recipes, like egg, pasta, or potato salad. Mayo, mustard, and vinegar just taste great together.
BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zipto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•How to distinguish between human-created content and AI-generated content?
1·3 months agoAgreed. I wouldn’t want to be sold something just plainly generated by someone else, especially if they didn’t put any effort into it.
I have had a pretty good time coming up with stupid prompts with friends, but I think the social aspect is doing the heavy lifting.
BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zipto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•How to distinguish between human-created content and AI-generated content?
34·3 months agoI’d like to preface that I like AI content for my own amusement and sometimes for convenience. I think it’s neither the best nor the worst thing to ever happen to the world like so many lemmy users seem to.
Current state, most AI generated content (images, video, even text) have some general tells. For text, they tend to lean on certain phrases and formatting. Picture and video both still contain noticeable artifacts that give it away, though that is becoming less prevalent over time. They’re a lot more noticeable when you use the tools yourself and trying to overcome the patterns is difficult without manually intervening.
I think you have to ask yourself what degree of human involvement is the cutoff for you. Is it only 100% non generated content? Even prior to the sudden llm push, that would be really difficult to find. A lot of software, photoshop and predictive text for example, have used machine learning to improve their algorithms for years. It’s not likely you’ll find anything unassisted anymore. What degree of human made modifications AFTER something is generated is enough to consider it good enough? If I start with a generated image but significantly modify it with an image editor to fix issues and finalize the ‘vision’, is that enough?
I personally think you’ll have to create your own compass. Bad content is bad regardless of how it’s made. If you cannot tell the difference if a human made it or a machine, does it really matter?
I read a lot of fan translated content and I always appreciate the translation of “the child of a frog is a frog” (translator note: idiom similar to “the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree”)
I find you get to learn an approximate translation of an idiom and get the intent of the phrase at the same time.
All I’m saying is that the suspected use of AI shouldn’t be the reason you don’t like it. Instead, dislike it because of all the points you made about the article.
I think it’s safe to argue that most news articles are not thoughtfully put together, regardless of the use of AI. Bad news articles existed before AI and will continue to exist long after.
You really gotta stop ruining things for yourself by caring so much about something so inconsequential.
Hey, reading comprehension isn’t an issue. Not gonna read past that though since you started out by stating that you’re a massive douchebag. Probably just kept hammering that home, anyway.
This is giving some strong “bullets don’t kill people, it’s the blood loss and organ damage” and I don’t like it.
BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zipto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev• Want to piss off your IT department? Are your links not malicious looking enough? This tool is guaranteed to help with that!
18·3 months agoI’m a user, I know users are idiots.
BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zipto
Videos@lemmy.ml•CEO grabbing a tennis star’s hat which was being given to a child
3·4 months agoWhat if it is my job?
BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zipto
Fediverse memes@feddit.uk•Is this the typical behaviour of fediverse users? Posts in Apple and Nintendo communities immediately get downvoted by people disliking the companies. Can’t they just block the communities?English
1·4 months agoValve isn’t perfect but they’ve gotten a lot of community good will by not being shitty and vindictive. Nintendo has been just really shitty to their own fans for a long time, with unnecessary litigation and criminal prosecution.
I do agree that tribalism is pretty extreme within the fediverse, but I also don’t think that’s anything new for any small internet community.
RIP your eyes friend, who knew something so inconsequential would ruin them so badly. I hope you find peace in blindness.
Lemmy users not crying about AI challenge: impossible
Bad attitude, bad attitude. Fuck off with this pointless complaining.




“issues groveling apology”
Telling the llm that it should apologize doesn’t count as groveling. It cannot express how sorry it is because it cannot be sorry.
The fediverse’s infatuation with finding any and every possible criticism of AI is draining. In one breath, people will hit you with the “schrodinger’s immigrant” quip, and then tell you that AI is completely worthless and unwanted but also somehow too powerful and dangerous.