They definitely do, especially legacy stuff that’s still kicking. Sweet, sweet tech debt that you hope won’t be a real problem until you’ve moved to a different company.

I’ve used word/onenote or FOSS equivalents the same way, they’re fine as a scratchpad for notes. As you said it’s nice being able to shove images in there. There are so many things that don’t belong anywhere else that I will forget after even a half hour break.

I’m doing my part by writing really shitty foss projects for AI to steal and train on.

By international law they can use weapons supplied by other nations even for long range strikes into Russia yes, to my knowledge it’s just a gentleman’s agreement that they follow the terms of the nation supplying them. Not really a point of contention though as it would be idiotic to violate those terms at risk of not being supplied anymore.

The only point of contention is whether supplying nations should decide to allow strikes into Russia with their equipment because Russia continues to threaten that it would see that as an act of war from the supplying nation. So legally nothing wrong with it but you have to weigh that decision with possibility of starting World War III or a nuclear apocalypse.

Damn they swatted the code therapy dude…what a niche youtube channel to decide to fuck with.

Literally FFX-2

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

A citation with a superscript number reference in a comment? Impressive.

Freakonomics is always solid.

I’ve actually heard that with black bears the best method is to ditch it in central park with a bicycle.

Tell that to conventional current vs electron flow. Science is ever updating with new information and the words we use to describe it will change over time as well, but I get what you mean. Prescriptive linguistics especially in formal settings like scientific writing is helpful for clear communication.

Descriptive linguists unite! Words evolve and that’s okay. Really science should pivot away and start calling more proven theories a different word if they’re upset about the confusion.

The etymology of the word theory comes from a word with a meaning closer to “to look at or speculate” so even in that sense science kind of hijacked a word that was further from the modern scientific understanding of the word “theory” and descriptively transformed it themselves for use in their community. And that’s okay too.

I always like the comparisons to how magical our world would seem to someone in an alternate reality where transistors or maybe even electricity wasn’t a thing.

Like you can dumb it down to really magical sounding things like calling a cpu “runes etched in sand”.

Honestly if it stops some single player games from shoehorning multiplayer aspects where they don’t fit that’s a win too.

Looking at you hitman…

White light has red in it. Cyan does not. We fatigue blue and green cones everywhere but the white can, and we only stimulate the red cones on the white can. The result is it looks red.

It’s important to note how we got here. In old English man just meant human. Wereman meant male and wifman meant female. Over time that “were” prefix got dropped and man now means male but the ambiguous meaning of humankind stuck around. In fact “human” comes from old french “of man”, again the non-gendered use of the word man.

The point is to fix all these problems we just have to bring back the “were”. The progressive werewolves are way ahead of us on this issue.

Honestly thought Taylor was PS bound regardless of the Wilson situation. He was on and off PS all year so there wasn’t really a fear of losing him. Keeping Wilson pleasantly surprised me…keeping Newman though…

Yeah we usually keep around 6 CBs, 9-10 OL, 5 edge guys. Definitely a stranger year proportionally but were still waiting for IR moves and waiver claim stuff. With PS game day elevations I’m not too concerned about rolling with 4 CBs temporarily.