https://xcancel.com/caitoz/status/1982598726591140234 (https://x.com/caitoz/status/1982598726591140234)
Etc.
The obvious solution is to forbid medias to be bought by the wealthy, giving them to their journalists. And to also increase the pluralism instead of aiming for a uniformity/pseudo-objectivity/‘chase of the militant medias’.
The problem isn’t the existence of far-right medias, but that they’re disproportionately supported by the anti-communists/wealthy, and that there’s almost no anti-imperialist/communist media in comparison.
At least in my opinion.
As an example to continue C.Johnstone’s enumeration, many people oppose communism because they love freedom, how stupid is that.
And atrocity propaganda is unfortunately here to stay.
They see a tyranny to bring down, while i see a population opressed(, from the start,) for their political/economic ideals : https://t.me/MFARussia/27001
My point would be that no western media will ever defend the DPRK, and that lack of pluralism is considered normal. How easy it is to win a debate if only one side can speak.
I’m an American. I realize every news source I grew up trusting is imperialist propaganda. I’m not really sure how I’m supposed to know what is going on in the world as everyone who says anything has an agenda.
I’m really not trying to get into a flamewar, but is there an argument that Putin attacking Ukraine is not just aggression?
This has been talked about extensively on this site. Just have a look at the links folks have put together here: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/9212334
