Like if I want to download one of the ones that’s around 5GB, how do I know which one is the best one?
Media info 1
Video
ID : 1
Format : AVC
Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec
Format profile : High@L4
Format settings : CABAC / 4 Ref Frames
Format settings, CABAC : Yes
Format settings, Reference frames : 4 frames
Codec ID : V_MPEG4/ISO/AVC
Duration : 1 h 34 min
Bit rate mode : Variable
Bit rate : 6 986 kb/s
Maximum bit rate : 20.0 Mb/s
Width : 1 920 pixels
Height : 1 080 pixels
Display aspect ratio : 16:9
Frame rate mode : Constant
Frame rate : 25.000 FPS
Color space : YUV
Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
Bit depth : 8 bits
Scan type : Progressive
Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.135
Stream size : 4.63 GiB (84%)
Writing library : x264 core 148 r2715 7e75228
Encoding settings : cabac=1 / ref=4 / deblock=1:0:0 / analyse=0x3:0x111 / me=umh / subme=10 / psy=1 / psy_rd=1.00:0.00 / mixed_ref=1 / me_range=120 / chroma_me=1 / trellis=2 / 8x8dct=1 / cqm=0 / deadzone=21,11 / fast_pskip=1 / chroma_qp_offset=-2 / threads=8 / lookahead_threads=2 / sliced_threads=0 / nr=0 / decimate=1 / interlaced=0 / bluray_compat=0 / stitchable=1 / constrained_intra=0 / bframes=16 / b_pyramid=2 / b_adapt=2 / b_bias=0 / direct=3 / weightb=1 / open_gop=0 / weightp=2 / keyint=250 / keyint_min=126 / scenecut=0 / intra_refresh=0 / rc_lookahead=250 / rc=crf / mbtree=1 / crf=16.0 / qcomp=0.50 / qpmin=6 / qpmax=51 / qpstep=4 / vbv_maxrate=20000 / vbv_bufsize=25000 / crf_max=0.0 / nal_hrd=vbr / filler=0 / ip_ratio=1.40 / aq=1:0.80
Default : Yes
Forced : No
Media info 2
Video
ID : 1
Format : AVC
Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec
Format profile : High@L4
Format settings : CABAC / 4 Ref Frames
Format settings, CABAC : Yes
Format settings, Reference frames : 4 frames
Codec ID : V_MPEG4/ISO/AVC
Duration : 1 h 34 min
Bit rate mode : Variable
Bit rate : 6 986 kb/s
Maximum bit rate : 20.0 Mb/s
Width : 1 920 pixels
Height : 1 080 pixels
Display aspect ratio : 16:9
Frame rate mode : Constant
Frame rate : 25.000 FPS
Color space : YUV
Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
Bit depth : 8 bits
Scan type : Progressive
Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.135
Stream size : 4.63 GiB (92%)
Writing library : x264 core 148 r2715 7e75228
Encoding settings : cabac=1 / ref=4 / deblock=1:0:0 / analyse=0x3:0x111 / me=umh / subme=10 / psy=1 / psy_rd=1.00:0.00 / mixed_ref=1 / me_range=120 / chroma_me=1 / trellis=2 / 8x8dct=1 / cqm=0 / deadzone=21,11 / fast_pskip=1 / chroma_qp_offset=-2 / threads=8 / lookahead_threads=2 / sliced_threads=0 / nr=0 / decimate=1 / interlaced=0 / bluray_compat=0 / stitchable=1 / constrained_intra=0 / bframes=16 / b_pyramid=2 / b_adapt=2 / b_bias=0 / direct=3 / weightb=1 / open_gop=0 / weightp=2 / keyint=250 / keyint_min=126 / scenecut=0 / intra_refresh=0 / rc_lookahead=250 / rc=crf / mbtree=1 / crf=16.0 / qcomp=0.50 / qpmin=6 / qpmax=51 / qpstep=4 / vbv_maxrate=20000 / vbv_bufsize=25000 / crf_max=0.0 / nal_hrd=vbr / filler=0 / ip_ratio=1.40 / aq=1:0.80
Default : Yes
Forced : No
Media info 3
Video
ID : 1
Format : AVC
Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec
Format profile : High@L4
Format settings : CABAC / 4 Ref Frames
Format settings, CABAC : Yes
Format settings, Reference frames : 4 frames
Codec ID : V_MPEG4/ISO/AVC
Duration : 1 h 34 min
Bit rate mode : Variable
Bit rate : 6 986 kb/s
Maximum bit rate : 20.0 Mb/s
Width : 1 920 pixels
Height : 1 080 pixels
Display aspect ratio : 16:9
Frame rate mode : Constant
Frame rate : 25.000 FPS
Color space : YUV
Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
Bit depth : 8 bits
Scan type : Progressive
Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.135
Stream size : 4.63 GiB (92%)
Writing library : x264 core 148 r2715 7e75228
Encoding settings : cabac=1 / ref=4 / deblock=1:0:0 / analyse=0x3:0x111 / me=umh / subme=10 / psy=1 / psy_rd=1.00:0.00 / mixed_ref=1 / me_range=120 / chroma_me=1 / trellis=2 / 8x8dct=1 / cqm=0 / deadzone=21,11 / fast_pskip=1 / chroma_qp_offset=-2 / threads=8 / lookahead_threads=2 / sliced_threads=0 / nr=0 / decimate=1 / interlaced=0 / bluray_compat=0 / stitchable=1 / constrained_intra=0 / bframes=16 / b_pyramid=2 / b_adapt=2 / b_bias=0 / direct=3 / weightb=1 / open_gop=0 / weightp=2 / keyint=250 / keyint_min=126 / scenecut=0 / intra_refresh=0 / rc_lookahead=250 / rc=crf / mbtree=1 / crf=16.0 / qcomp=0.50 / qpmin=6 / qpmax=51 / qpstep=4 / vbv_maxrate=20000 / vbv_bufsize=25000 / crf_max=0.0 / nal_hrd=vbr / filler=0 / ip_ratio=1.40 / aq=1:0.80
Default : Yes
Forced : No
There is probably not much difference, I would just go with the one that has most seeders. Whats the site btw? I’d love to get some more Spanish language torrents.
that’s rarbg.to
Thanks!
Imo it’s the best public tracker for movies
It can be multiple things:
- A difference in compression. The ones with bigger sizes will usually have better quality in this case.
- Sometimes the small 1080p files are just 720p upscaled.
Some torrents with larger files are worth the effort, other times the difference in quality is negligible.
x265 is a far better encoding format than x264, I’ve seen better quality movies that are half the size. I’d go with that whenever its available.
btw I also have platform downloaded, excited to watch it.
I’ve seen it and thought it was good. It’s also really kinda fucked up.
I think there are differences in how the video and audio are encoded in most of these. There is a Wikipedia article that tries to help people understand the different symbols and abbreviations. There are a lot of different ones in that picture and on RARBG in general.
- DDP5.1, I think this stands for Dolby Digital Plus and has something to do with how the audio is
- x264
- x265 (also called HEVC, High Efficiency Video Coding)
- H264
- WEBRip, just means it was taken from the web (e.g. AMZN means it’s been taken from Amazon Prime)
If i understand right, the ones which start with x (x264,x265) are just the same as the H264, and H265 standards, but just refer to the software used to package it.
H265 is newer than H264, and is able to compress the same video quality more resulting in between 25% to 50% reduced filesize.
https://www.macxdvd.com/mac-dvd-video-converter-how-to/x264-vs-x265.htm
I mean… all three examples you posted have basically identical encoding settings. The only thing that would be likely to make a difference at that point is the source.
Maybe I pasted the info for the same file thrice lol
edit: no they actually have the same encoding
probably reposts of the same encode
The larger ones have higher bitrates (video or audio or both), therefore better quality
To be completely honest I am not nitpicky about video quality at all but was just wondering.
I can’t see any differences in the three media infos you dumped. The release group is different in the torrent name but if they’ve been encoded the exact same way, you won’t notice any difference.
The x265 use the newer version of the codec (from 264) and can make files smaller while retaining quality. You should probably go for that one as it’s a faster download, but of course we’d also need to see how it’s been encoded.
