• BOMBS@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Putin mentions nukes every 2 weeks. We’ve been habituated by his frequent mention of nukes. I won’t bat an eye until one actually goes off, for which I’m sure there are already plans in place to address by multiple countries, to include non-Western ones. Putin’s wanna be mind games are a broken record. I’m excited for when this guy is no longer in the news.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I hope the west is prepared, we’re looking a little dog-bites-tail on the coordinated front.

  • Wilshire@beehaw.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The puppet state of Belarus is going to join Russia in its collapse.

  • worfamerryman@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, a guy I see interviewed on YouTube claims to be an ex-cia agent. He said he was basically a James Bond kind of agent. I always doubt these kinds of people.

    Anyway, he was saying that Russia will give nukes to belarus and possibly have Belarus’s launch the nuke to Ukraine or Poland.

    After that who does nato retaliate against? Belarus? Russia?

    So if he is correct, then Belarus may be launching nukes.

    • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The main purpose of nuclear weapons is nuclear deterrence, not launching them. Belarus being next to NATO’s occupying forces makes it a highly likely target for a NATO invasion, this secures some stability in the region from Russia’s perspective.

  • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “Nooooo, we are the only ones who can have nukes in puppet states all around the globe, nooooooooooo!”

    ~A liberal

    • MatFi@lemmy.thias.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As a German, I would say that the degree of “puppetishness” is a little different from that in Belarus.

      • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        UK, France and Israel. Previously the US had nuclear weapons stationed in Japan and South Korea.

          • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            1 year ago

            All of Europe works as puppet states to the US, it doesn’t matter what the official book says because if they would say it out loud then Europe would realise they are being dragged into collapse by the Empire. The same can be said of Israel, you will not hear US officials admitting it, but they maintain good relations because Israel is a key political figure to keep a level of destabilisation in West Asia, Europe fulfils the same role but to control Russia.

            • Wilshire@beehaw.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The US has a strong economic influence, but those countries still have sovereignty and can have disagreements. Lukashenko has no option but to obey Putin or he’ll be dead.

              • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                If you want to know what happens to sovereign countries that step out of line with the US, just look to Libya (highest HDI in Africa to bombed out husk with open slave markets) once it gave up its nukes at US request or Japan in the 90s (dared to have too competitive of an economy, was fiscally destroyed via US financial policy) or Iraq (US-supported against Iran, then targeted for destruction because it opposed being a US client state).

                To be an enemy of the US is dangerous. To be an ally is lethal. European leaders are aware of how destructive the US and US-based transnational capital can be. They know how the system works and why their imports are so cheap. Now they’re helping the US deindustrialize themselves, which would be counter to any sustainable base of power and economic position without some other leverage (generally sopaking, economic and military threat to everyone else).

      • agarorn@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Germany has us nukes. Not that we are a puppet state, but it is undeniable that the US has stationed them in bases around the world.

        • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Germany is in the American sphere of influence and has opted to sacrifice much of its economy for US interests against Russia.

          Y’all are pretty puppety when push comes to shove.

          • agarorn@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sacrifice “much” of its economy? Isn’t that a little exaggerated?

            • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              No it’s going pretty badly. The energy price spike took out a ton of industry that is very unlikely to come back. If the current state of things is maintained it will just be a large loss. If similar shocks hit a few more times they’d be looking at deindustrialization.

              • agarorn@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Which tons of industry have been took out? The energy spike is over. I think all energy costs are now higher than the day before the invasion.