• Sodium_nitride
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    4 months ago

    China plans to build ‘Three Gorges dam in space’ to harness solar power

    I see the Chinese have found access to space rivers?

    But jokes aside, I think it’s a bit clickbaity (from the article) to say “China plans” when the article only mentions a single scientist who is pretty much saying “wouldn’t it be cool if we had this?”. I’m sure out of all countries, China could build this, but I’d temper my excitement from just this statement.

    • someone [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yeah, and orbital microwave power stations also have arms-control treaty implications. China has agreed (through accession) to following the stipulations of the Outer Space Treaty which forbids weapons of mass destruction in space. The difference between a microwave power transmitter and an orbiting energy weapon is only the difference between aiming it at a ground station’s rectennas and aiming it at a military target. Traditional ground-based solar power has its flaws but at least it’s an undeniably peaceful project.

    • ImmortanStalin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 months ago

      Carve out a 50 year plan and get it done in 10. Meanwhile the private sector finally sets up its own space station that stays in orbit for 3 days.

  • iridaniotter [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 months ago

    I mean I guess we’ll see how fast space industry develops with the proliferation of reusable rockets but I seriously doubt gigawatt scale powersats will happen in the next couple of decades.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      4 months ago

      If Chinese moon base plans pan out, then it might be cheaper to start producing stuff on the moon and sending it to orbit from there at some point. I agree this is decades away either way though.

      • iridaniotter [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        I mostly agree. Space-based solar power is probably right at the boundary of space infrastructure that’s feasible while largely relying on Earth-based supplies.

  • buckykat [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Imagine installing a solar array 1km wide along the 36,000km geostationary orbit,”

    This seems like a very weird idea for where to put a space based solar array. The geostationary orbit is already pretty crowded, and a lot of the array would be edge on to the sun at any given time.

    • iridaniotter [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 months ago

      GEO is the traditional place to put powersats. They stay in the sun for like 99% of the year and they’re always above your rectenna. Also there’s way less variation in velocity among GEO satellites so you’d expect Kessler syndrome to be less of a concern.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, if USSR made it through the 90s then it likely would’ve been doing some really amazing things today. Luckily, we’ve got China to carry the torch now.