You might think this is not important to communists, but I think it is. At least if I made my point understandable.

  • CriticalResist8OPA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    17 days ago

    Side note I originally uploaded the wrong URL and I’m very glad Lemmy allows us to edit titles and links so that I could fix it!!

  • amemorablename
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    17 days ago

    Good stuff. On this part:

    Problems have a solution: if there is no solution, then there is no problem. This is always true.

    I take it it’s meant to be a logical thing? Like: So long as there is a possibility of a solution, you can try. When there isn’t a possibility, there’s nothing to solve at that point. (Though there are probably few cases that would fit with there being no possible solution.)

    Or do you have some other meaning in mind?

    • CriticalResist8OPA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      17 days ago

      It’s a dialectical meaning. If there’s no solution to a problem, then you have something other than a problem on your hands. An impossibility or a fatality. You must thus reframe that impossibility until it becomes a problem so that a solution for it exists.

      In practical terms: I’m hungry on this desert island and there’s no food around me -> being hungry is not a fatality, I can find food -> finding food becomes the problem, how do I solve it? -> I’ll go walk around the beach and look for coconut trees.