• @pingveno@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    Lyft/Uber. They had a strategy of eliminating their taxi company competition by flooding the market with such low fares that the taxis couldn’t compete. That said, the taxi companies had a miserable reputation in many cities. They often came late or not at all, they usually required a phone call to dispatch, and they were quite expensive. But still, the tactics Lyft and Uber used to gain market dominance was dirty and monopolistic.

    The flip side of this is that I can avoid the trap of car ownership, with all of its problems and expenses.

    • PicoBlaanket
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s true.

      Lyft and Uber are taking advantage of both:

      • the drivers (who are sub-contracted, legally-unassisted, and underpaid)
      • and the passengers (surge pricing).

      Even worse - those companies SEEK to replace drivers with self-driving vehicles. They will terminate their entire sub-contracted workforce (the drivers… the people who do the actual work), without obligation.

      This has been their goal from the start.

      • @pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        I guess I’m more concerned about the short term well being of the drivers than anything else. Surge pricing at least has a purpose, to attract drivers to an area. And with self-driving cars, I like the idea of using them as a solution to the last mile problem in transit.

    • TheOneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Why not use public transportation ?

      I personally think that public transportation is peak efficiency.

      • @pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        I do 99% of the time, but public transportation is often either very slow or not present at all. Take going out to see my aunt. Luckily I can take a light rail train most of the way. However, I then have to get on an infrequent bus. It can mean a trip taking an hour and a half, both ways. And that’s in a relatively good transit city for its size and being in North America. Late night also tends to not be great for transit, though I can bike just fine then.

        Basically, I rely on bike and bus for most of my transportation, but use Uber/Lyft to fill in for the times when those preferred options won’t cut it.

    • TheOneOP
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      No, it does not.

      (as a side note it’s better to support competition )

      • PicoBlaanket
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Although… in youtube’s greedy, ad-spamming opinion - those apps are certainly infamous.

        But I do see why those apps don’t count… as, from our standpoint, they are purely simple, awesome, and free. (and they really are)

  • art
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    I use a couple of infamous apps:

    • Meta Messenger: My whole family uses it. It’s only text application my mom knows how to use.
    • Uber/Lyft: I recently moved to the suburbs after living in the city for years. The bus system is bare bones and the rail system is non-existent.