• Kata1yst@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Most debt actually can’t be inherited, instead debt collectors get first dibs on inheritance assets until they’re made whole or the estate runs out of assets, whichever comes first.

      That doesn’t mean that debt collectors won’t try to convince family members to pay. Just tell them where they can shove it.

      • erwan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        You don’t inherit debt but they’re paid on the estate before inheritance.

        So you can’t get just debt as inheritance, but debt are only lost for the creditor if the person who died had a negative net worth.

        • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Exactly. You don’t inherit debt, because you can’t inherit stuff the person was only borrowing.

            • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              23
              ·
              4 months ago

              My dad did this. Was almost 70k in unsecured debt at the time of his death. I gave most everything away except his fishing stuff. He had so much shit.

              Only one credit card company said “it’s good you are taking over the payments”. Told her I never agreed to that, just informing you of his death, and if they contact me again my Saul level lawyer is going to enjoy that lawsuit. Never heard from them.

              Don’t ever assume the debt of someone else.

              • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                4 months ago

                Aw damn, I’m glad you knew better, that’s downright predatory and should be illegal. You know there are people out there now paying their parents’ credit card bills, thinking that that’s just how things are. I hope that when those people find out, they are entitled to getting every penny back with interest.

              • disgrunty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                4 months ago

                And check your local inheritance laws. Some places will take pre-death gifts into account depending on how long the time between gift and death is. The UK, as an example, looks at gifts made up to 7 years before a person’s death. It’s messed up.

                • erwan@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  In France there is a limit, about 30k every 15 years. It’s not messed up, it’s necessary if we want inheritance taxes to have any weight.

            • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Buy physical gold & hide it (and well, not just in the house).

              What are they going to do? Sue your descendants for something they can’t prove?

        • Mango@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          If there’s any debt collectors who think my parents owe them more than they owe me, I have news for them.

  • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Damn…makes me want to take the time to pirate games I already bought and own…

    And then write it in my will that those who inherit my few earthly possessions have to play through each of my games at least once in front of a lawyer in order to receive their inheritance. Lol, I kid, 😂…or am I 😈?

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    4 months ago

    How will they control if someone other continue with your account when you die?

    • Moghul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      4 months ago

      Same as any other illegality. It’s legal until you get caught. The account will work fine until for one reason or another it becomes obvious you’re not the original owner of the account, and then it’s banned. Billing changes, location changes, ip changes, confession, etc.

      • Zerush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Maybe some generations later in the future it becomes suspicious. Valve want gain money and there is no reason that it will deep investigate if the downloads are still paid from the same account and paid with the same banc account, irrelevant if it’s from a different IP or ISP, that are things that can change even with the same user (transladet to other city, changing provider or PC, etc).

        • Moghul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          4 months ago

          But imagine if the original owner bought Skyrim, and then you have to buy it again if you want to play it. Two Skyrim moneys!

          • Zerush@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Anyway, if I’m dead I’ll give a fuck if Valve want to claim something

  • bitfucker@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    4 months ago

    Shame. It would be a good way to know if you are their favorite child lol. All joking aside, I think this is a compromise as others have alluded deep in comments. Valve likely doesn’t care or enforce it, but they don’t want to be responsible for account transfer due to games licensing and other legal shenanigans.

  • The_Walkening [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I wouldn’t suppose that people are required to inform steam that they’re dead. Therefore, I’d assume the easiest way to bequeath games/DLCs, etc, is to get a wishlist from your loved ones, and then gift all of those games prior to death on a credit card that you might not be able to pay, due to being dead. Steam gets the money, the CC company gets shafted. Alternately, share your credit card details with a loved one and that list, and have them order within hours of your death (this depends on whether or not you were plausibly alive when those CC transactions took place)

  • Dave@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Is this any different from selling an account, which I presume you’re not allowed to do?

    • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s probably they don’t want to dive nose deep into all individual cases and local shenanigans* about that and probable scams that can occur. You can take other person’s account if you have both password and email access, they don’t oppose that under the table, but they don’t want to be a party in account transit because it makes them responsible for that.

      * Is it legal what’s described in one’s last words, can these games be lawfully transfered as they are under both legal code and game licensing agreements? If there’s no more living relatives, would Steam transfer your purchases to the government? Or if the inheritance is disputable between two parties, should it decide anything there? They let anything happen as long as they aren’t involved.

      • Dave@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        As another poster alluded to, digital goods aren’t really considered property in the traditional sense. Digital property is protected under copyright (and other IP laws). The owner could sell the game, but then they wouldn’t own it anymore (e.g. when one game studio buys another, they are buying the games as well). Instead, they grant a licence to use the game, which is how Steam works as well.

        If Steam let you transfer your account to someone else (e.g. bequeath or sell it), then they would need this in the licence (which they could do in theory). Other than the logistics of that (especially how to handle people selling accounts - and the scammers that inevitably come with that), the AAA publishers are unlikely to agree to those terms. Ultimately the Steam licence is likely a compromise between Steam’s vision and all the AAA publishers that wouldn’t publish on Steam if they didn’t get the licence they wanted. A bit like how Netflix doesn’t really care if you use a VPN, they just have to enforce it so studios will let them use their content.

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I would say in one sense yes, because typically property being bequeathed follows different customs than property being sold for profit.

      But the point in this case is that your Steam library is not even “property” to begin with, it is a contract that becomes invalid when one of the parties (the customer) dies.

  • d-RLY?@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    Would be kind of funny to see the different stats that would change if a family was able to pass on the full account. Like maybe one child didn’t give a fuck about games (outside of just signing in here and there to keep it alive and update stuff like email and security) and no other activity. But then their kid goes hard into games and see the gaps of time. There would be lots of accounts that may have super awkward stuff like hentai visual novels. lol. But seeing some stupid high amounts of achievements and total hours of play time would be neat.

    But not exactly shocking that these digital accounts would not have the ability to go much past your death. Unless we see the very deep change of all companies allowing people to remove a game and basically “gift” it. Which I can’t see happening. Even physically having discs/carts hits a limit after so long. Normal wear of use and the material rotting does mean it is likely those would also not survive past a couple of generations. And that ignores the same issues afflicting the consoles needed to play the media.

    So basically the real solution to both the digital and physical passing games (or music/movies) is to rip DRM-less copies and keep the needed tools to either use the game without having the disc or needing to register to a server that is likely gone. Might be a good idea to leave ReadMe instructions along with the iso/rom and copies of the official and community patches that help with new OSes. After that it is basically just down to needing virtual machines or some other PC emulators to run old emulators.

  • arxdat@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Ahh, let the Ensh*ttification of all these platforms wash over you.

  • AlyxMS [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Also like all steam applications bundles with Steam’s DRM, right?

    Wonder what happens when valve/steam shut down one day.

    • smnwcj@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Best case scenario it’s bought, or other platforms honor a number of steam purchases as a perk. But ultimately…poof

      Luckily they make a lot, have relatively low operation costs, and are a private company that doesnt need to be enshitified for share holders

    • Hawke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Why is the cc-by-nc-sa license disappointing? Is your disappointment exclusive to version 4.0?

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Why is the cc-by-nc-sa license disappointing? Is your disappointment exclusive to version 4.0?

        My only disappontment is with those humans (and humans who use ““humans””) who side with AI model using corporations that steal other people’s content to train said models for profit, over regular everyday people.

        Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

  • applepie@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    4 months ago

    blockchain would solve a lot of these issues but IP owners and even steam likely, appear to be allergic to the idea of digital ownership. i wonder why?