don’t read the entire article in one sitting
I like the Reuters (CIA) headline of this. It reads “Taiwan president quits as party head after China threat bet fails to win votes” 🤣🤣
Based Chinese citizens in Taiwan
lmao that sure is an article
Inb4 Vaush call it “book”
it’s a tough read
Its enough for anarchists
the article is just a sentence…
Tl;Dr. Can someone give me the jist?
it’s hard to briefly summarize the article, but I think the following is a decent outline of the article’s general points: “Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen resigns as head of ruling Democratic Progressive Party following local election losses.”
Typical wordy leftist over explaining. 🙄
Your summary is so good the author replaced the article with your summary. Guess they didn’t need the filler content.
Chad journalist not writting hundreds words of filler content. /s
For a second I thought this was somewhat rude…and then I actually clicked the link 😂
mucho texto.
Tbh I could see this becoming the new American journalistic
bare minimumgold standardI get the feeling that “article” is a placeholder until they can find a way to work this into the Chinese aggression narrative.
I NEED TEH TLDR
Attempting to summarize:
Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen resigns as head of ruling Democratic Progressive Party following local election losses.
Result (4 words, -75.00%):
Tsai Ing-wen head loss
The meme is even longer than the article somehow.
Knowing the DPP William Lai will ascend and then start a fucking war lmao
What does this mean for Taiwan?
Another western puppet from her party will take the reins. Even if the KMT wins the next election, the most that would happen is probably some de-escalation between the two sides of the strait.
Why is it that the KMT is closer to the CPC than the liberals? Has the KMT transformed into a more general conservative and less outright fascist party? At least on the topic of reunification the liberals seem multiple times more bloodthirsty.
Why is it that the KMT is closer to the CPC than the liberals?
Most likely because of the shared identity as being ethnically Chinese, the whole 1992 consensus which acted as the basis for cross strait talks was essentially “we are one China, but with two different interpretations (PRC and ROC)”. The KMT is still a tool of the US, but their older members aren’t completely suckers for the imperial Japanese as the DPP.
The DPP at its core pushes for separatism while being 100% pro Japanese and pro western, seeing themselves as superior ethnically/racially to the mainland (similar to how many of the mentally colonised people in HK calling us locusts).
As far as both parties go, the DPP outwardly pushes for independence while the KMT muddies the waters by being de-facto independent while keeping up appearances.
Taiwan is not a country, just a rebellious part of the PRC/srs
it’s wild this doesn’t show up in searches
it doesn’t?
