I’m genuinely starting to think there’s some sinister plan at work here. America does not want Hillary to be president, how many times does she have to lose before this becomes clear?
deleted by creator
It cleverly shifts blame from the systemic sexism of american politics onto the voters while rehabilitating their image for the clowns who think the dems care about them.
And it’s certainly going to add to the Gender War™ Discourse going about on the brain-poison apps where just like last time, if you don’t vote for Hillary this time, then you’re automatically a misogynist supporter of patriarchy no matter what your rationale for withholding is, or how materially founded your rationale is.
This’ll have the knock-on effect of amplifying the typical outsider’s view of feminism as a whole (despite their cone of view only seeing neoliberal feminism) as a viper pit of misandry, virtue signalling, and toxicity.
tl;dr: if you’re not off Twitter yet, AND if this isn’t neocon driveling; then you should probably prioritize being off Twitter before the New Year hits, 'cause it’s gonna get worse.
deleted by creator
you’re just full of walls of text today, rodent friend
deleted by creator
'twasn’t a complaint
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deplorable tankies and large walls of text go together like rodents and raw grain
deleted by creator
My brothers, sisters, everyone in-between and outside; I am so fucking tired of liberals and I pray this is simply neocon rumor milling.
i guess if there’s going to be a widely disliked war, you might as well give the liberals the first woman president as a form of bread and circus
How else they would ensure they lose again?
Could it be that it is she herself that is doing the push? She and all those “foundations” and other financial orgs with the Clinton name on it
Tbf the only sources I can find on this are tabloid rightist crap. Hopefully she stays gone. Hopefully she redacteds.
I’ll admit I got this from r/conspiracy, but it seemed relevant to us.