• SudoDnfDashY
    link
    fedilink
    15
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    I personally use Metager. Open source, and funded by a nonprofit. Its also carbon neutral which is really nice.

    • @pinknoise@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      33 years ago

      There cool and around since forever. Sadly according to their privacy policy they forward parts of user agent and ip to third partys to show “non-personalized ads”. But you can use them via their onion service :)

    • IngrownMink4
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      You’re right, it’s a very interesting search engine and it complied on its promise to be good for the environment.

      • @Echedenyan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        03 years ago

        I would recommend you using the English version because the Spanish one has not the translations finished.

        Other idea would be helping to translate it.

        They own a GitLab instance.

        • IngrownMink4
          link
          fedilink
          03 years ago

          Other idea would be helping to translate it.

          How can I help with the translation?

  • @ttmrichter@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    73 years ago

    There’s a certain irony to a page that’s accusing DDG of being “a privacy abuser in disguise” whose site causes this:

    • @gmate8@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      23 years ago

      I looked at the information they provided, and Gabriel Weinberg really made NamesDB.

      • @ttmrichter@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        53 years ago

        I looked at the malformed certificate and said “I’m not stepping past this point”.

        I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make here. I’ve written code that is still used by SWIFT to this day. Does that make me a banker apologist? (Also which of approximately 10,000 projects named NamesDB?)

        • @pinknoise@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          63 years ago

          The certificate isn’t “malformed” it’s just not signed by one of the holy approved certificate authorities.

          • @ttmrichter@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            53 years ago

            Allow me to rephrase.

            I looked at the dodgy certificate and said “I’m not stepping past this point”.

            • @pinknoise@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              43 years ago

              You certainly didn’t miss anything, but the certificate isn’t any more dodgy than that of any other site.

              • @ttmrichter@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                33 years ago

                Self-signed certificates are too silly to bother with. Might as well go straight http if you’re going to go self-signed.

                A CA-signed cert reduces the chance of a bad actor between me and the target site. A self-signed cert opens the door to trivial MitM attacks.

                • @pinknoise@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  43 years ago

                  A CA-signed cert reduces the chance of a bad actor between me and the target site.

                  Because bad actors that can hijack your traffic are unable to get a fake certificate signed?!

                  A self-signed cert opens the door to trivial MitM attacks.

                  How would that be?

  • @leanleft@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    43 years ago

    it’s been i have seen it pushing link tracking into their html(non-js) site. that has prompted me to quit. i’m using qwant for the time being although it kinda sucks for things that i research.
    i use a searx instance(google) for one of my browsers on mobile.
    the best solution is going to have to be to build something custom.