• Skua@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Surely this is more like adding a couple extra constituencies that are a bit geographically splintered? I know the powers and structure aren’t identical to MPs, but it’s not like you’re voting to just give three specific guys jobs for life

    • Art35ian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s likely 100s of jobs for life, with government pension added at retirement. Math that out over 25 years and it’s somewhere around $500 million dollars.

      If my tax dollars are contributing to $500M in my lifetime, I want it going to people with degrees and a fuckton of experience.

      The last time we let someone into politics with no experience and no degree, we got Pauline Hanson. I’m not voting yes to 100 more Pauline Hansons.

      • Skua@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        About a quarter of the MPs in parliament haven’t got degrees. Plenty of their staff won’t have either.

        $500,000,000 over 25 years is less than a dollar per person per year. Let’s not pretend that the number you’ve come up with there is some bank-breaking extravagance for a large economy over the course of decades.

      • doublejay1999@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You dig up 200 billion dollars of minerals out of their back yard EACH YEAR and you don’t feel like kicking back literally a couple of quid ?

        Nice

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        So why do you believe non-white people couldn’t possibly have “degrees and a fuckton of experience?”

        • Art35ian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Because the people put into these Voice positions will be Elders of Indigenous communities.

          And since I personally worked on the 2013-16, $10M Indigenous communities research project for utilities connection and communication strategy, I know that 11% of the people in those communities are literate and the data point for tertiary-level education was so low it was rounded to 0.

          To communicate the process of utilities connection, it was determined to best use pictures, which is still the strategy today.

          Any more questions, hero?

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ah, so it’s not that you’re racist because you believe indigenous people are inherently less capable, but instead that you’re racist because you see nothing wrong with perpetuating institutional racism. “Disadvantage must be maintained!” is your credo.