I found this deleted tweet of some guy legitimately trying to argue that bombing Russian cities is the next logical step. Now while this one was deleted, his timeline for the last 13 hours has been nonstop warmongering and calling for direct attacks on Russian citizens.

Serious question: Are these people even human? Not to sound like some reptilian conspiracy theorist, but are there really functional adults out there who believe that bombing civilian populations is just going to magically stop the war? That Russia isn’t going to retaliate?

  • @CITRUS
    link
    232 years ago

    Ah yes because bombing high populated cities wouldn’t push the desperation of nuclear warfare, who is this guy anyways?

    • @MzuarkOP
      link
      132 years ago

      No idea. Like many blue checkmarks, he’s just some guy who says insane things and gets paid to do it.

      • @CITRUS
        link
        52 years ago

        Blue Checkmarks are just insignias for sellouts

  • @sinovictorchan
    link
    182 years ago

    Russians are bombing military base in major cities and military force who use civilian as meat shield, but no Liberals justify the legitimate military attack against combatants in Ukraine cities to stop Kiev military attack on Ukrainians in rebelling states. Yet, they claim that attacks on Russian cities is now good in their double standard?

  • Star Wars Enjoyer A
    link
    182 years ago

    Bomb relevant Russian cities … [prevent] use [of] chemical arms or nukes

    my guy, Russia’s nukes are mobile. Their nuclear doctrine is to keep their nukes mobile, ready to show up anywhere on or near the front at any moment, they take great care to conceal the locations of their nuclear transport trucks. Bombing Moscow and St. Petersberg won’t keep Putin from declaring a state of war with NATO and using the nukes. If anything, it would just be a provocation for cities like Berlin or London to get glassed.

    • @KommandoGZD
      link
      182 years ago

      Even if they weren’t, just how fucking infantile do you have to be to think Russias nukes are just in some “relevant cities”?

      That guy’s completely off his marbles anyway, but stuff like this is almost insulting to read. How fucking dumb are these people or how dumb do they think their audience is?

    • @MzuarkOP
      link
      102 years ago

      Not to mention Russia isn’t building nukes or chemical weapons they have them. And have had them for decades. You’d have to be an actual moron to think you can cripple Russia before they can deploy a nuke.

  • @HaSch
    link
    172 years ago

    The current war euphoria on Twitter is the closest the West has ever come to having a Stakhanovite movement

    • @PolandIsAStateOfMind
      link
      4
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Not wrong, one thing west excell at it was always war. And since they reached the imperialist stage of capitalism, it’s basically only war.

    • @AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I genuinely want to coin the term “war fetishism”.

      Hear me out…

      In fetishes like BDSM, etc, you’re aroused by the IDEA of that thing happening to you, and while you may roleplay and pretend, you presumably don’t ACTUALLY to be chained up in the sex dungeon of an ACTUAL psychopath. And with things like fetish porn, you very much have a pretend scenario designed to show what the user wants to see, not what would actually be realistic.

      Similarly, of all these people drooling over the idea of war, approximately none of them ACTUALLY want to face the horrors of war. But they love the idealized movie-esque idea of war. Not saying they get a sexual attraction to war, but the mental mechanics are likely very similar

      The volunteer fighters in Ukraine are a prime example of this. Was all gung-ho to go to war, right up until they actually faced the kind of hell on Earth war actually is.

    • CritiGalDesist∞
      link
      32 years ago

      Yes! Bots with blue tick marks! Officially approved bot from NATO

  • @Stalins_Spoon
    link
    62 years ago

    Brainlet either thinks Putin will just ‘give up’ if major Russian cities are bombed or that all of Russia’s nuclear weapons are in/near those major cities, both of those ideas being equally idiotic.