• Muad'DibberOPA
      link
      83 years ago

      They also hadn’t updated their public codebase in over a year, until they received so much backlash over it that they had to do so. They are def not to be trusted.

        • @Cysioland
          link
          53 years ago

          I feel like most of the “pro-privacy” options are honeypots designed to catch the kind of people who’d use pro-privacy options

    • Bilb!
      link
      fedilink
      23 years ago

      Well, he does say “and elsewhere.” 😉

  • @mullapoo
    link
    63 years ago

    What is this saying, exactly?

    • Muad'DibberOPA
      link
      133 years ago

      Its the main dev of signal, moxie, who’s an anarcho imperialist, criticizing another security company for not solely working for the US gov like he does.

      • @tronk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        43 years ago

        I didn’t know he does work with the US government. Sounds scary. Is he implementing backdoors or something like that?

        • @Nevar@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          53 years ago

          Considering he lists two US allies, Turkey and the UAE, in his list of bad countries he seems to be a bit of a useful idiot.

    • @iliya@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      13 years ago

      Regardless of how you feel about Moxie, my takeaway is that if you live in one of the countries serviced by Cellebrite, make sure you really check your phone for vulnerabilities. Otherwise, use Signal (or any other chat service) at your own risk. ¯_(ツ)_/¯

  • Star Wars Enjoyer A
    link
    53 years ago

    didn’t Signal get accused of farming user data? if I’m remembering that right, then this is the pot calling the kettle black… but also the pot calling the kettle black, while also interjecting that their own perceived notions about the people who use kettles proves that the kettle is worse than it is.

    I don’t generally give a shit about using any of these apps, I barely know what they do, but c’mon Signal, get your shit together.

    • Muad'DibberOPA
      link
      93 years ago

      They do, which is illegal to verify, because any US based company isn’t allowed to notify the public if its been asked by the US government to hand over its data. Many of us are not going to be surprised when signal turns out to be Crypto AG all over again.

      Either way signal’s main identifier is phone numbers, which is tied to your identity. So even if the message contents are properly E2EE, they still have a connection map, as in names and addresses, of who contacted who at what time. And of course its a US company so that makes it inherently insecure.

  • @mrshll1001
    link
    33 years ago

    Even just reading this a while back put me off Signal: Drew DeVault - I don’t trust Signal

    Then I learned Dmitry Kleiner (author of the Telekommunist Manifesto) has also been incredibly critical of Signal for accepting US Government cash. He’s made references to it in several tweets, and I trust his work, but I haven’t cared to look myself. I couldn’t find the tweets after a quick search but if someone is more thorough than I am then he’s at @dmytri@twitter.com.

    I continue to use Signal cautiously, as I have some folks on Signal. But I won’t do any organising on it.