• loathesome dongeater
      link
      4
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      I think it’s kg/capita

      For the US:

      (6.9×1000000×1000)÷(32.82×10000000) = ~21
      
  • @k_o_t@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    03 years ago

    this isn’t a terribly helpful graph as it is now, because it’s impossible to tell how much of this comes from different things like hand-help electronics like phones and laptops, home appliances and most importantly electric cars, being the most popular in nordic countries, which could count as a lot of e-waste…

    • Muad'DibberOPMA
      link
      2
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      Why shouldn’t those things be included exactly?

      • @k_o_t@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        i’m not saying these should be excluded, but rather that the graph should somehow indicate these things

        for example, a person X in some country might be buying a 100 gram smarphone every year for ten years and change three gasoline cars in that period, which would result in a kilogram of e-waste, whereas a person Y in some different country could be using a single smartphone for this entire period and a single electric car in that period, which would result in a 2001 kilogram of e-waste

        this creates a false impression that a person X is less wasteful, i.e. this graph should be adjusted for the sources of e-waste