• bighi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        The amount of ethics of any leader is irrelevant in capitalism. The system itself demands the creation of monopolies and constant growth. If you try to be a good person, some other company will “win the race” and take you out of the competition one way or another.

        Expecting or demanding ethics of people is trying to fix the wrong problem, while the solution is toppling the entire system.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s more than that - once you grow to the point where management don’t all have personal relationships, how do you decide who to promote?

          Metrics. Meaning, money minus controversies… So basically, everyone with decision making power is incentivized to push profits as far as they can without crossing that ever shifting line where the public gets pissed at them…

          At all levels, there’s a selection pressure to find the people who push the boundaries as far as they to maximize short term profits without drawing attention to how the sausage is made…

          With that as the basis for all promotions across all industries, is there any surprise we are where we are, with the system cannibalizing itself now that there’s no new markets to expand into?

          • bighi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            All of that has been predicted by Marx since the 19th century. And he already created a better system.

  • fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m an Apple customer but this is straight up wrong. Non-compete clauses this broad are ridiculous and practically stop ex-employees working anywhere they’re actually skilled to work. It quite literally ends someone’s career after their tenure.

    If you’re expertise is SoC design and implementation, to be contractually restricted from working anywhere else that does SoC-related business is effectively kicking you out of the very industry and job pool you’re capable of working. Your mobility is totally stifled.

    These kinds of restrictive covenants need to be outlawed or at least be limited to a short time frame no more than six months, requiring ex employers to pay the ex employee during this time if made redundant or fired or requiring the incumbent employer to pay the new employee during this time until they’re legally able to work again.

    Hopefully this case goes against Apple favour and sets a strong precedent against absurd non compete clauses like this.

    • Asymptote@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      In Denmark, non compete clauses like these require the old employer to pay you for the period you’re not allowed to compete.

    • bighi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Non-compete clauses should be illegal (or done like in Denmark, like the example of our fellow commenter here)

    • sebinspace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Was going to say, fuck Apple, but if you think they’re alone in this, you are obscenely naive

          • set_secret@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            you’re were ‘going to say’ but your ‘going’ preface implied that you didn’t actually, even though you did write the text ‘fuck apple’. semantics, however I don’t think we should ever miss an opportunity to say fuck apple. Fuck Apple.

            upon re reading your text I now understand you were using the term ‘going to say’ in a colloquial sense not a literal one, so I misinterpreted the comment sry.

        • dynamojoe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe not in this article but this is a perpetual accusation for just about any large and successful corporation to deal with. Using “Apple” gets headlines, but you’ve probably read similar accusations against Alphabet, Microsoft, Epic, EA, John Deere, etc…

  • moitoi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Each day, I read people discovering neoliberalism. It amazes me how naive people are.