The arrival of US soldiers for a peacekeeper training exercise in Armenia has rankled the Russian government, which has for decades acted as the sole security guarantor for the former Soviet republic. The 10-day “Eagle Partner” exercise, which began Monday, involves 85 US and 175 Armenian soldiers and aims to prepare the Armenians to take part in international peacekeeping missions.

The exercise, while small in scale, is the latest in a series of what Russia’s foreign ministry has deemed “unfriendly actions” taken by its traditional ally.

Armenia recently sent humanitarian aid to Ukraine for the first time, and its parliament is set to ratify the International Criminal Court’s Rome Statute – meaning it would be obliged to arrest Russian President Vladimir Putin if he were to set foot in the country, which Russia has long viewed as its own backyard.

Armenia’s flirtation with new international partners has been spurred by its frustration that Russia has been unable or unwilling to defend it against what it sees as aggression from neighboring Azerbaijan, and has raised questions about Russia’s ability to retain its hold on countries and conflicts across the former Soviet empire.

Armenian President Nikol Pashinyan said his country was beginning to taste the “bitter fruits” of the “strategic mistake” of trusting Russia with near-exclusive responsibility for his country’s defense.

“Armenia’s security architecture 99.999% was linked to Russia,” he told Italian newspaper La Repubblica earlier this month. “But today we see that Russia itself is in need of weapons… Even if it wishes so, the Russian Federation cannot meet Armenia’s needs.”

    • arymandias@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Also did Turkey not hugely sponsor Azerbaijan in the war against Armenia recently?

          • BakedGoods@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            29
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Of course they would. Your fat joke of a wannabe dictator will dance to any tune if you throw enough money at him.

            • Furball@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              10 months ago

              Turkey is never going to let Armenia in, the hatred between their nations is too great. There would be riots in the streets of Turkey if they allowed Armenia to join

          • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            27
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Maybe one day you’ll be able to elect a government that isn’t full of wannabe fashists and will actually acknowledge what was done to the Armenian people.

              • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                The Armenian genocide happened in early 1900s, in World War 1. Turkey murdered roughly a million armenians. Some historians argue that the Holocaust by Nazis was inspired by and modeled after that genocide.

                • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Ah yes, the only genocide that has its kill count increase each year way after its supposed end. Did it reach a million this year?

                  Not denying a massacre between both sides happened, every source out there is unbelievably inconsistent with their numbers. Considering Turkey offered Armenia to research it properly only to get a refusal, Armenia definetly plays a the victim that paints the picture worse.

                  Comparison between a systematically supported eradication of people by the government and a really badly managed revolt control attempt of a country does not make sense.

          • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            The problem is that if the rest of NATO could drop Turkey, they would have done it already.

      • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        We never really gave a fuck about Azerbaijan except as a thorn in Russia’s side.

        But if they, along with Turkey, can stop being dicks to Armenia, then they can ask him forces, take back Georgia and then Turkey can rule the Caucasus and extract all the wealth from that region in the name of Western capital.

        Hopefully this time they don’t do another Iraq. Out of the place.

    • Blursty
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      Does Armenia have a massive Nazi issue like Ukraine?

      • holycrap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Don’t be so hard on Ukraine. they’re addressing their nazi problem one dead Russian at a time.

        • Blursty
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          But the Ukrainians are the Nazis man. Isn’t this a “no u” with extra steps?

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          10 months ago

          According to Mediazona, a media outlet founded by US-funded Russian opposition figures, Russian losses are dropping, nearing almost their lowest since the special military operation began. In their own graph, they show how Russian losses were highest during the fighting over Bakhmut. They were also high during the initial phase of the SMO.

          That Russian losses are significantly lower now even according to pro-NATO sources at a time when even the Western media admits to catastrophic losses by Ukraine, tells of the lopsided nature of the Ukrainian offensive in Russia’s favor.

  • squiblet@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Russia is “what?? You don’t want to be defenseless if we invade you?! Hmmmph”

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The arrival of US soldiers for a peacekeeper training exercise in Armenia has rankled the Russian government, which has for decades acted as the sole security guarantor for the former Soviet republic.

    Since Pashinyan came to power in 2018 on the back of Armenia’s “Velvet Revolution” – an outpouring of anger against lingering corruption and cronyism in the former Soviet republic – his country has faced growing tensions with Azerbaijan.

    Dumoulin also pointed to the growing ties between Moscow and Baku – spurred by the personal relationship between Putin and Azerbaijan’s longtime President Ilham Aliyev – which may have come at Yerevan’s expense.

    It’s some 260 people armed with rifles – not heavy weaponry – gathering in Armenia for nine to 10 days, to improve what they call ‘the interoperability of peacekeeping forces,’” said Ter-Matevosyan, pointing to the routine nature of such exercises around the world.

    The Kremlin banned dairy imports from Armenia in April – ostensibly after some newly discovered health concerns, but in what Ohanyan suggested was a punishment for Yerevan considering the ICC ratification.

    For Ter-Matevosyan, the current Armenian government, whose “ideological roots come from… liberal Western values,” have taken this “opportune moment” to implement “some of their ideas, thoughts and beliefs that they cherished for many years.”


    The original article contains 1,582 words, the summary contains 211 words. Saved 87%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • zephyreks@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Turns out that when you ally yourself with the West, Russia doesn’t see a reason to provide you with as much support as when you align with Russian interests. No way!

  • Blursty
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    "US soldiers for a peacekeeper training exercise "

    Lol, US soldiers for a peacekeeping exercise. ROFL even.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      FFS keep the CIA out of other countries. They’ve caused chaos and terrorism everywhere they’ve gone.

  • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    You mean, Pashinyan flirting with the West led to Russia decreasing support for Armenia? No way!

    Pashinyan is in a situation of his own making.

  • whitecapstromgard@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    10 months ago

    Russia saved Armenia back in 2020.

    In 2020 Azerbaijan defeated Armenia in the battlefield. Armenian armies melted away, and Armenia had no answer to Ajerbaijan’s Turkish Bayraktar drones. Khankendi was cut off from mainland Armenia and Azerbaijan was preparing to take it.

    Russia stepped in and told both countries to put a stop to the fighting. The resulting deal was very generous to Armenia given their hopeless military situation. Azerbaijan only accepted it because they were afraid of Russia.

    • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Well, that’s to be expected if that was the deal from the beginning. However, Azerbaijan shouldn’t have defeated Armenia in the battlefield, Russia should have been there from the start to help them, not after the battle.

      The resulting deal was very generous to Armenia given their hopeless military situation.

      It was hopeless BECAUSE they decided to rely too much on Russia, that was the point of their agreement.

      • whitecapstromgard@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Azerbaijan has more than 3 times the number people Armenia has. In addition Azeris have oil/gas and a strong ally in Turkey. Armenia’s hopelss militaty situation is a given. They can’t win any fight. The only thing they have going is Russia’s support. Without Russian support Armenia is in a very bad spot.

        In fact the only reason the 2020 war happened is that Azeris correctly predicted that Russian support for Armenia is not what it used to be, given Pashinyan’s desire to flirt with the West.

        • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          So basically, you agree with the point that trusting Russia to defend them was not a good idea since their support was late when Armenia needed it.

          • whitecapstromgard@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            I’m laying down the complicated geopolitics of Caucasus, which you seem to be completely ignorant of.

            Armenia would not have lost Karabakh if it wasn’t for their desire to move closer with the West 🤣

            • Xia@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              you doesn’t make any sense.

              Well you do because you deform the fact.

              Azeris attack Armenia. Armenia call Russia for help, Russia didn’t move. Armenia get crush by azeris Russia, after a long time, just intervene to say “Ok time to stop but good run azeris you can keep the land”. AFTER that Armenia began its rapprochement with the West

              • whitecapstromgard@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                You know nothing about the Caucasus. Your timeline is wrong:

                1. Armenia has been occupying Azeri land since the war in the 90s. Azerbaijan could not do anything because Russia supported Armenia.
                2. In 2018 the government of Armenia gets toppled by Pashinyan, a pro-West politician. Russia stops protecting Armenia and in 2020 Azerbaijan moves in to take back Karabakh.
                3. Armenia is crushed in the battle (no surprises there!). This is a very one-sided fight and Armenia has no chance.
                4. Russia steps in at the last minute to save Armenia from total failure. The resulting peace deal is very generous to Armenia given how poorly it did in the battle.

                The second Karabakh war happened only because of the 2018 coup in Armenia which gave control of Armenia to a pro-Western government. Without Russian support there was nothing Armenia could do to stop Azerbaijan taking back the land that was stolen in the first Karabakh war.

                • Xia@jlai.lu
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  You basically just said the same thing than me, thank you.