• NewPerspective@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    If white space carries any function that the compiler/interpreter needs to know about like structure or scope, it’s probably not a very good programming language.

    • sajran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Genuine question: why? What makes, say a semicolon, so superior to the the newline or tab characters?

      To be clear: I don’t think whitespace as a part of syntax is an awesome idea which should be more popular. It’s definitely a bit more error prone in some ways. It’s not perfect. But it’s okay.

      I’ve written a lot of Python and I don’t think I have ever seen a syntax error caused by incorrect whitespace. I’m not exaggerating. I regularly forget semicolons in other languages but I never type out incorrectly indented code. Maybe that’s just me though…

      • Reptorian@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        From some one who used Python as it was the easiest solution to few of my problems, and having to experience languages with brackets and/or endif/fi/done as ways to limit scope, I find that having things like brackets and/or scope terminators easier to parse and less error-prone. I’m thinking about moving on to Ruby whenever I had a need where Python would be a good choice, but the time it takes for me to understand a new language is blocking me from that.

      • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I honestly think the scripting languages like fish have got it right.

        Newline by default completes a line and can optionally be escaped. Saves you most of the semicolons and even implicitly highlights multi-line statements.

        Whitespace doesn’t matter except for separating names.

        Blocks are explicitely ended without braces you can confuse with brackets or parentheses, no matter the coding style.

        If Rust and fish had a baby, I think it would be the best language to have ever been created.

    • Thoth19@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Intmain(intfoo){std::out<<“HelloWorld”;}

      Is a great program and should totally be valid cpp. White space sucks.

      /S

      • jvisick@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not who you asked but I think they’re important for humans, but syntactically I don’t think they should matter.

        It should be ok to add a line break wherever it makes the code more readable, but I don’t think a compiler should care whether some code is all on one line or 10

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Load-bearing whitespace is the fucking devil. This thread about hot takes is topped by a comment highlighting how people can’t even agree what kind of whitespace to use.

      Python - you want code to fail if someone from one camp copy-pastes code from another camp, and the characters that make a difference are invisible?

          • jvisick@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I agree! I don’t think 3?”stuff”:”empty” should work at all because I think it’s an insane way to type a ternary :) I’m also very open to admitting that it’s just my own strongly worded opinion.

            I think that in most cases, syntactically significant whitespace is a horrible idea - the one exception being that you should have space between operators/identifiers/etc. I don’t care how much, and 4 spaces should have no more special meaning than 1, but I do think that using a space to indicate “this thing is a different thing than the thing before it” is important.