• ashtrix@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hate to be that person but no headphone jack for a sustainable phone?

    • sheogorath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know it’s a crutch, but there’s always a USB-C to 3.5mm converter. There are some versions sold that still keep the charging port.

    • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      My phone came with usb-c earphones.

      Is that not an acceptable compromise?

      Works fine for me.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      53
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are headphones that use the USB port. Headphone jacks are kinda dead tech at this point.

        • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          Credit card reader hooked into headphone jack is a dead tech too now that the rest of the world have moved on from mag stripe to chip and pin.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          comfortable headsets, audio without batteries

          These are both solved via USB headsets tho?

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              20
              ·
              1 year ago

              If you buy this phone, you’re exclusively buying it for sustainability, so you’re already accepting an inferior product.

              There’s no reason to cling to headphone jacks as if those are somehow a worthwhile technology.

      • dx1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Audio quality loss and latency are built into Bluetooth. Its only advantage is not having a wire.

          • dx1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh, you mean USB headphones? TBH, way overly complex compared to analog with (albeit negligible) audio quality loss, which still works with legacy tech going back decades. It’s like arguing a bicycle is obsolete because motorcycles exist.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              If bicycles and motorcycles competed for the exact same role, with an opportunity cost allowing only one, how would bicycles not be obsolete?

                  • potustheplant@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You did, because you’re assuming that you can only choose one or the other. Even though it’s been demonstrated that the headphone jack does not require much space, can even be added to phones that don’t have it (check out Strange Parts on yt) and does not have any drawbacks.

                    That opportunity cost is not a thing.