Well, well, well, what do we have here?

Why yes, it’s a case study of the European Union’s Court of Justice’s first President! And it says here, specifically:

Pilotti was indeed not the only first member of the Court who had worked in the interest of fascist régimes. Among his eight fellow judges, several had links with [them] in the 1930s and 1940s. Karl Roemer, the German advocate general, had similarly to Pilotti professional activities which were hidden from his CV. While his official CJEU biography claims that he was a lawyer in Berlin from the 1930s until 1946, he had in reality spent the entire war period in Paris, as a member of the economic administration of the German military government of occupied France. His compatriot Otto Riese had been a member of the Nazi party in Switzerland from 1939 to 1945. Riese’s proximity with the party was such that the Swiss Conseil d’Etat had after the war temporarily suspended him from his position as professor at the University of Lausanne. Finally, there was Maurice Lagrange, the first advocate general of the ECSC Court of Justice, whose case represents with Pilotti’s the most striking continuity with the pre‐1945 period. Lagrange had been an ardent follower of the ideology of the gouvernment de Vichy, France’s collaborationist régime during World War II. As historians Marc-Olivier Baruch and Laurent Joly have shown, he was one of the key actors behind the French anti‐Semitic policies of 1940 and 1941.

Gee, I wonder what that is supposed to mean!