The fact is its not controversial to call it a disorder and … Just because some people prefer something else doesn’t make what they prefer to be a medical fact or the other option to be offensive.
I dunno, let’s see what it says in the introduction:
Today, the new nomenclature is widely accepted, although not by all clinicians and researchers (Pasterski, Prentice, &
Hughes, 2010a). Some authors argue that the diagnosis CAH
should not be included in Disorders of Sex Development, since in
most cases gender identity and gender assignment is not proble-
matic. Also, males with CAH do not present with developmental
problems of the reproductive system (Gonzalez & Ludwikowski,
2016). The ESPE Diagnosis Classification published in 2007
stated that “disorders of gonadal differentiation, that do not
result in sex reversal/virilised female infant/undervirilised male
such as: Klinefelter syndrome and Turner syndrome” should be
excluded from the section sex chromosome DSD (Wit, Ranke, &
Kelnar, 2007), contrary to the inclusive approach of the Chicago
consensus (Pasterski, Prentice, & Hughes, 2010b).
Thus, it looks like the controversy is among practitioners, while the authors note that no one has really examined what the individuals with the conditions (as you quoted in your other comment) think. Which is what the paper was attempting to answer.
I’m not going line by line over this paper with you, you’re going to have to read the rest on your own.
The fact is its not controversial to call it a disorder and … Just because some people prefer something else doesn’t make what they prefer to be a medical fact or the other option to be offensive.
Here it is, actual proof you didn’t make it to the third sentence of the abstract.
Removed by mod
I dunno, let’s see what it says in the introduction:
Thus, it looks like the controversy is among practitioners, while the authors note that no one has really examined what the individuals with the conditions (as you quoted in your other comment) think. Which is what the paper was attempting to answer.
I’m not going line by line over this paper with you, you’re going to have to read the rest on your own.
Removed by mod