He previously accused me of ad homonym for suggesting JFK Jr was a “pseudoscientific grifter”, and then saying his blanket opposition to lockdowns was indicative of a liberal tendency. I am very tempted to point out that now he is the ad homonym user, but I realize that I can annoy him more simply by continuing to not respond. I’m also tempted to send the Chinese “Copium” react image, but that seems not to be worth it.
Don’t take my question as a full endorsement of JFK (obviously I am a communist, not a lib) but what made him pseudoscientific or a grifter? I know he was a complex figure who had lots of pros and cons, I’m just not sure which cons would fit those definitions
Perhaps they meant RFK Jr., who has some good ideas but like OP noted is mostly just weird on vaccines and shit.
Oh you’re probably right, I didn’t see the “junior”