I was browsing the r/IsaacArthur subreddit, and found this word salad. They get wall.

  • @CriticalResist8A
    link
    111 year ago

    The -oid suffix comes from eugenics, I don’t think it can be divorced from this because it was made specifically to denote race.

    • DankZedong A
      link
      61 year ago

      Is this a new rule? The term westoid gets thrown around a lot here.

      • @CriticalResist8A
        link
        10
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s not a rule, just something I try to notice and notify people on.

        Edit: technically it would be a rule under rule 1, no bigotry, but we don’t really enforce it in this case.

    • Max
      link
      6
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Got some more info on that? The suffix certainly far predates modern (mid to late 1800s) eugenics. Did the Greeks use it to describe some ancient eugenics movement I’m not aware of? It’s root eidos is a common word—not to mention, newton discussed oblate spheroids in the 17th century.

        • @PolandIsAStateOfMind
          link
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Linguistically, calling someone a “westoid” would mean like a westerner, but not from the west.

          So, a comprador or other (neo)colonial bootlicker.

        • Max
          link
          11 year ago

          Good point. I was just curious if this was another instance of modern science borrowing from the eugenics movement. I don’t want people to think I was trying to defend the use of -oid or something.