Hello everyone. I hope you have read my two previous posts regarding my findings about Xinjiang.
https://lemmygrad.ml/post/420481
https://lemmygrad.ml/post/420432
These, findings seem to contradict the claims of MSM regarding a key aspect about the narrative on Xinjiang.
But the key word is “seem”. I believe that my findings require more critical analysis and refinement, I am not an expert in these sorts of things, and particularly because one of my arguments in https://lemmygrad.ml/post/420432 looks like its leaning to the “Causation correlation” fallacy.
Also, this should get more traction in the Pro-PRC side because it is non-PRC evidence which contradicts claims of MSM.
I am not an expert but as long as your source is factual, the size of the sample is representative, you did the math well and you interpretex the graphics correctly, it should be good.