Answering @Oatsteak 's “Feels sexist somehow. Am I hYsTeRiCaL??? No but seriously, am I?” post,
why these choice are likely offered and which choice one should make and why.
The choice is between, by taking the least amount of assumptions, a single cat girl freshly created from a futuristic 3D bioprinter that is designed to be easily capable of finding the wisher’s person attractive, even if for just a brief moment, similar to this short music video story, while not needing extra housing or feeding, versus having Russian communists win the next national elections, and form a union with Belarus into the Soviet Union again.
Many lonely males might be tempted to take the cat girlfriend instead as she is like a great juicy steak for the sex-starved heterosexual male, but just like a lifetime supply of steaks in a time of sporadic food shortages, a cat girlfriend during a “severe” shortage of cat girlfriends (nyaa, uwu), is only a single lifetime’s relational capital for a single person on average,
whereas the reformation of the Soviet Union, seeing at how the collapse of the Soviet Union caused misery to hundred of millions of people, likely improves many of these lives as it can take example of China.
Therefore “The reformation of the great Union of Soviet Socialist Republics” is the correct choice, unless you’re sure it’s going to happen anyway.
As someone on the probably other end of the socialist spectrum on this particular issue, namely relationships and sex, I would accuse you of making a suggestion for a pro-sex-capitalist stance or a misandrist/sexist stance (Which anyone can make, I’m not going to hold this against you, I just want to use this as a stepping stone to my plea), in case the capitalist attitude is opportunistic and you start making a 180 degree when the shoe is on the other foot.
And I would say that it is against the communist “to each according to their needs” and socialist “to each according to their contribution” in terms of goods, capital and services when it comes to sex, to which I include free access (to relationship services, 3D printers, bioprinters, etc.) to and the distribution of relationships, including that of cat girlfriends made possible by an abundance of relationship-seeking cat girls.
All the while, I will assume that you are likely a heterosexual female, which means you currently own the means of reproduction by being in a not too visible but still significantly lesser in numbers to your heterosexual counterpart, males, until old age,
which is like partaking in a musical chair dance with other heterosexual females with one chair more than there are players, while the relational landscape for heterosexual men is a game of musical chairs in which the chair is owned by their counterpart group that can reject them at all times and have the option open for them of a relationship/sex “chair” at all times.
It makes me draw a parallel to women who parade with signs telling heterosexual men who has ownership over women’s bodies in terms of sex and painting anyone objecting to the current system as a rape apologists, with the Anglo-American petty bourgeoisie on youtube during the reign of Trump, who constantly were asking their audience to think about what store owners think and how store owners feel during left-wing protests and riots, especially the George Floyd one, and would call anyone objecting to the current system an apologist for thieves and looters.
It’s a kind of “easy for you to say” when you have the means of production or reproduction
and have the power to deny others from having it.
This parallel ends however at public use as reproduction is solely a service that has a two-way street of demand and supply, whereas production is most often associated with goods.
I would have called this principle of mine sexual communism,
that is to say that if the demand and supply do not meet,
then the pie on one end or the other should be made larger,
but unfortunately I have also visited incel community forums
because I thought I could perhaps find one that
would not be fascist, misogynist and support my principle,
to which I have not found none,
but to my surprise I found one or two
that also advocated for a concept called “sexual communism”,
but of course, it was a concept that if I could
would rename it to sexual fascism,
as that would make it more clear for everyone,
including the incels there themselves,
especially with the general nazi vibe I got from that forum,
as their communism in sexual communism is about as accurate,
as national socialism is in socialism, or none at all.
Like I said, sex and relationships are a two-way street of demand and supply,
but according to the incel forum I visited,
sexual communism is “Seizing the means of reproduction”,
meaning mandatory supply of sex services when asked,
and of course only supplied by women.
So, in conclusion, I need a name for my principle
and it can’t be sexual communism unless someone can
appropriate the term for me and turn the incel version to sexual fascism.
And Oatsteak, I would not call you hysterical,
considering some people’s opinions on this matter,
but I would say that people wanting a relationship
and escapism where relationships are being offered relationships for free,
are not bad things.
I would say escapism offers people to think better
about society and how they can change it.
Or at least think about what they want,
before jumping on every slight opportunity,
whenever a good/capital/service is in the wisher’s vicinity.
Also, I am of the opinion that there’s a shortage of marriageable (in age) women that I think needs to be addressed,
in terms of adding more of them, so society can function more perfectly.
Answering @Oatsteak 's “Feels sexist somehow. Am I hYsTeRiCaL??? No but seriously, am I?” post,
why these choice are likely offered and which choice one should make and why.
The choice is between, by taking the least amount of assumptions, a single cat girl freshly created from a futuristic 3D bioprinter that is designed to be easily capable of finding the wisher’s person attractive, even if for just a brief moment, similar to this short music video story, while not needing extra housing or feeding, versus having Russian communists win the next national elections, and form a union with Belarus into the Soviet Union again.
Many lonely males might be tempted to take the cat girlfriend instead as she is like a great juicy steak for the sex-starved heterosexual male, but just like a lifetime supply of steaks in a time of sporadic food shortages, a cat girlfriend during a “severe” shortage of cat girlfriends (nyaa, uwu), is only a single lifetime’s relational capital for a single person on average,
whereas the reformation of the Soviet Union, seeing at how the collapse of the Soviet Union caused misery to hundred of millions of people, likely improves many of these lives as it can take example of China.
Therefore “The reformation of the great Union of Soviet Socialist Republics” is the correct choice, unless you’re sure it’s going to happen anyway.
As someone on the probably other end of the socialist spectrum on this particular issue, namely relationships and sex, I would accuse you of making a suggestion for a pro-sex-capitalist stance or a misandrist/sexist stance (Which anyone can make, I’m not going to hold this against you, I just want to use this as a stepping stone to my plea), in case the capitalist attitude is opportunistic and you start making a 180 degree when the shoe is on the other foot.
And I would say that it is against the communist “to each according to their needs” and socialist “to each according to their contribution” in terms of goods, capital and services when it comes to sex, to which I include free access (to relationship services, 3D printers, bioprinters, etc.) to and the distribution of relationships, including that of cat girlfriends made possible by an abundance of relationship-seeking cat girls.
All the while, I will assume that you are likely a heterosexual female, which means you currently own the means of reproduction by being in a not too visible but still significantly lesser in numbers to your heterosexual counterpart, males, until old age,
which is like partaking in a musical chair dance with other heterosexual females with one chair more than there are players, while the relational landscape for heterosexual men is a game of musical chairs in which the chair is owned by their counterpart group that can reject them at all times and have the option open for them of a relationship/sex “chair” at all times.
It makes me draw a parallel to women who parade with signs telling heterosexual men who has ownership over women’s bodies in terms of sex and painting anyone objecting to the current system as a rape apologists, with the Anglo-American petty bourgeoisie on youtube during the reign of Trump, who constantly were asking their audience to think about what store owners think and how store owners feel during left-wing protests and riots, especially the George Floyd one, and would call anyone objecting to the current system an apologist for thieves and looters.
It’s a kind of “easy for you to say” when you have the means of production or reproduction
and have the power to deny others from having it.
This parallel ends however at public use as reproduction is solely a service that has a two-way street of demand and supply, whereas production is most often associated with goods.
I would have called this principle of mine sexual communism,
that is to say that if the demand and supply do not meet,
then the pie on one end or the other should be made larger,
but unfortunately I have also visited incel community forums
because I thought I could perhaps find one that would not be fascist, misogynist and support my principle,
to which I have not found none,
but to my surprise I found one or two
that also advocated for a concept called “sexual communism”,
but of course, it was a concept that if I could
would rename it to sexual fascism,
as that would make it more clear for everyone,
including the incels there themselves,
especially with the general nazi vibe I got from that forum,
as their communism in sexual communism is about as accurate,
as national socialism is in socialism, or none at all.
Like I said, sex and relationships are a two-way street of demand and supply,
but according to the incel forum I visited,
sexual communism is “Seizing the means of reproduction”,
meaning mandatory supply of sex services when asked,
and of course only supplied by women.
So, in conclusion, I need a name for my principle
and it can’t be sexual communism unless someone can appropriate the term for me and turn the incel version to sexual fascism.
And Oatsteak, I would not call you hysterical,
considering some people’s opinions on this matter,
but I would say that people wanting a relationship
and escapism where relationships are being offered relationships for free,
are not bad things.
I would say escapism offers people to think better
about society and how they can change it.
Or at least think about what they want,
before jumping on every slight opportunity,
whenever a good/capital/service is in the wisher’s vicinity.
Also, I am of the opinion that there’s a shortage of marriageable (in age) women that I think needs to be addressed,
in terms of adding more of them, so society can function more perfectly.