• @RandomSovietKid
    link
    2
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    (or: revolution does not require violence)

    Where did you get that part from? I don’t see such a statement in the article.

    • @pimentoOP
      link
      2
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      Its been more than a week since I read that article, and that sentence is really my own interpretation of it. What I mean is that not succumbing to this western nihilism described in the article, is also a revolutionary act on its own. Sure a violent revolution is necessary sooner or later to take over state power, but only a small number of people will ever take part in that. Which is why this view that revolution = violence is nonsense to me.