Turns out if you define a third of your pale population as “Latinx” instead of white, very few white people remain.

Even the 2020 census had the sense (heh) to finally drop the “Hispanic race” and have it as a separate label, but the “researchers” felt like going out of their way to redefine it as a “race” again. Not sure why race is even treated as a scientific thing to begin with in their census, but such is the Amerikkkan way I guess.

Edit: don’t even want to think about the causes of this “age gap”

  • albiguOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    My issue is not with gender neutral endings in romance languages (though I think they’re rather underadopted right now), but that for some reason Yankees decided to go with the unpronounceable “X” ending rather than very old and established Latina/o or Latine or even Latin@. In my experience those are way more common than X endings, though I admit I haven’t looked at hard data on that.

    They could’ve just called them “Latins/Latin-Americans” but they chose to first a appropriate the grammar for “Latino” then think try to “fix” it in the classic Yankee fashion of not looking at already established norms.

    • ComradeSalad
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not meant to be spoken, it’s supposed to be a writing standard as opposed to a spoken one.

      “E” is also pretty common and it seems to be used interchangeably with “X”. That’s probably more of a personal choice.

      “X” is also commonly marketed as “Yankee solution finding”, when it was first proposed by a Puerto Rican Psychologist to challenge the gender binary of Spanish. It is not an American invention, it just gained popularity there first.

    • NoGodsNoMasters [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      decided to go with the unpronounceable “X” ending rather than very old and established Latina/o or Latine or even Latin@.

      Latina/o and latin@ aren’t really that pronounceable either outside of saying the word twice in both forms, and yet they get used a fair bit too. -x is certainly my least favourite way of doing this as well, but acting like it’s some yankee imposition seems a bit dumb

      • albiguOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just to make it clear, I have no issue with the “-x” ending in and of itself and “yankee imposition” implies that anybody in Latin America cares about what the Yankees have to say about Spanish (or in my case, Portuguese) in the first place. I just think that Unitedstadians created their own problem by calling us “Latino” instead of “Latin” or “Latin-American,” (which are both already gender-neutral) and then have to fall back to their own customs by putting the “-x” in there.

        It really is a minor beef, but it’s annoying to see them appropriating words and trying (and failing) to speak in Spanish to appear more inclusive. Their language is already gender neutral, they could just call us Latins, Latines, Latinamericans or (IMO my favourite) Americans, but gringo gotta appropriate culture.